Search for: "Manufacturing Company v. United States" Results 61 - 80 of 3,108
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Dec 2023, 11:32 am by jeffreynewmanadmin
The tools were then shipped to the United States and declared to be “German” products. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 5:40 pm by Michael Lowe
United States, 529 U.S. 667 (2000), as: a misappropriation of funds that enriches a person of power or influence who uses the power or influence to make a different individual, organization, or company richer. [read post]
9 Nov 2023, 10:59 am by Dennis Crouch
Matal concluded the PTAB provides reliable review American manufacturers need, saying recent cases like VLSI v. [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 10:43 am by Don Geiger and Eric Gill
To prove damages at trial, Cyntec presented a market-share lost profits theory, alleging that 27 companies purchased Chilisin’s accused chokes outside the United States and then imported devices including the chokes into the United States. [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 10:09 am by Holly
Check carefully that both the FDA and the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) receive the same information. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 6:26 am
The rapid speed at which AI capabilities are advancing compels the United States to lead in this moment for the sake of our security, economy, and society. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 9:07 pm by Tyler Hoguet
Secretary of the Interior Deb Haaland stated that the program reflects the Biden-Harris Administration’s commitment to clean energy and the United States’s growing offshore wind industry. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 8:59 am by Amy Howe
As a result, the agents told him, he would be unable to return to the United States – unless he agreed to become an informant for the FBI. [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 9:02 pm by Josephine A. Phillips
The rule prevents the funding from being used to directly or indirectly benefit countries “engaged in conduct that is detrimental to the national security or foreign policy of the United States. [read post]
19 Sep 2023, 3:34 am by Kurt R. Karst
  Specifically, the statute would be amended to require NDA sponsors to: (i) certify to the Food and Drug Administration that the information described in subparagraph (B) that is submitted to the Secretary is complete and consistent with the information such sponsor or holder provided to the United States Patent and Trademark Office and any communications such sponsor or holder had with the United States Patent and Trademark Office; and (ii) (I) submit to… [read post]
4 Sep 2023, 5:44 am by Kevin LaCroix
(Please note that these figures do not include state court securities class action lawsuit filings.) [read post]