Search for: "Mark 2 Mark, Inc."
Results 61 - 80
of 8,100
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Dec 2017, 6:30 am
In Arctic Cat Inc. v. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 2:48 pm
Jacobsen Products Co., Inc., 514 U.S. 159 (1995). [read post]
3 Jul 2019, 3:10 am
The Board reversed a Section 2(e)(5) refusal to register the package configuration mark shown below, for “canned fish; tinned fish. [read post]
24 Dec 2016, 4:04 am
Titanic Liverpool was unable to rely on the own name defence (Section 11(2) Trade Marks Act 1994). [read post]
13 Aug 2009, 9:37 pm
Lists of prohibited marks (including, of course, OLYMPIC) are set out in Schedules 1 and 2 of the Act. [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 3:16 am
See In re Nett Designs Inc., 57 USPQ2d 1564, 1566 (Fed. [read post]
15 May 2012, 3:07 am
(think Ralph Lauren) ran roughshod over Respondent Thread Pit, Inc. in this Section 2(d) cancellation proceeding. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 2:33 am
The Board dismissed this Section 2(d) opposition to registration of the mark NATURE'S PROMISE for "food for caged birds, pet food for small mammals, hay. [read post]
29 Aug 2019, 1:33 am
Tencent Holdings Ltd. and New Oriental Education & Technology Group Inc. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 8:43 am
Power-One, Inc., 2008 WL 1734833, at *12 (E.D. [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 7:26 am
Applicant, Guaranteed Rate Inc., sought registration on the USPTO’s Principal Register of the plain word mark GUARANTEED RATE and a GUARANTEED RATE design mark for use with various mortgage financing and banking services. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 2:43 am
Capital City Bank Group, Inc., 98 USPQ2d 1253 (Fed. [read post]
25 May 2011, 7:02 am
2. [read post]
13 Aug 2008, 9:49 pm
" The phrase "person interested" is defined in s. 2 of the Trade-marks Act. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 10:52 am
Texas (201)2. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 11:00 am
Finding that the two marks shown below, for cigarettes, falsely suggest a connection with the Shinnecock Indian Nation, the TTAB affirmed the PTO's Section 2(a) refusals to register. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 8:49 am
., Inc., No. 15-CV-02211, 2018 WL 3039734 (W.D. [read post]
12 Jul 2014, 12:27 pm
This did not fare well for Harry Winston, Inc., and its Swiss entity Harry Winston S.A., (“Opposers”) which opposed the registration of the mark under Section 2(d) of the Trademark Act, claiming that the BRUCE WINSTON mark so resembles trade marks WINSTON and HARRY WINSTON for jewelry that it would likely cause confusion. [read post]
2 Feb 2018, 2:52 am
The conclusion reached by the court was that the mark is indeed vulgar (page 9).2. [read post]
7 Aug 2017, 5:11 am
Aug. 2, 2017)Infinity sued Jay Franco for patent infringement, false marking, and false advertising. [read post]
