Search for: "Mark Dobbs" Results 61 - 80 of 255
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Dec 2021, 4:02 pm by CAFE
 Tamara Sepper – Executive Producer; Matthew Billy – Senior Audio Producer; Jake Kaplan – Editorial ProducerREFERENCES & SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIALS: Dobbs v. [read post]
28 Sep 2022, 6:44 am by J. Michael Goodson Law Library
Monday, October 3 marks the start of the United States Supreme Court's October Term. [read post]
28 Oct 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
 The dissent punctuates the absurdity of the historical analysis offered by the majority with an exclamation mark. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
On June 24, 2022, the Supreme Court eliminated the constitutional right to abortion in Dobbs v. [read post]
16 Jul 2022, 10:33 am by jonathanturley
Today, Res Ipsa passed the 60,000,000 mark in views on the blog. [read post]
22 May 2023, 3:00 am by jonathanturley
Yesterday, Res Ipsa passed the 71,000,000 mark in views on the blog. [read post]
  Anticipation of and speculation surrounding the Court’s decision in Dobbs, fueled by the leak of Justice Alito’s draft opinion, dominated headlines for months. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 8:58 am by Michael C. Dorf
No one (other than a few constitutional law professors) will notice or care about Burgum's principled stand for constitutional departmentalism.Overall, abortion seems to be more of a motivator now for Democratic voters than for Republican ones, a marked shift from the pre-Dobbs situation. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 7:00 am by Guest Blogger
              Dobbs is a recent example. [read post]
8 Dec 2022, 6:05 am by jonathanturley
Last night, Res Ipsa passed the 65,000,000 mark in views on the blog. [read post]
29 Jul 2022, 10:30 pm by Karen Tani
  Allison Orr Larsen on the Court's use of history in Dobbs and Bruen (Politico). [read post]
24 Oct 2022, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Gilles, What Does Dobbs Mean for the Constitutional Right to a Life-or-Health-Preserving Abortion? [read post]
22 Aug 2022, 7:05 am by James Romoser
Here’s the Monday morning read: Supreme Court issues rare emergency order favoring voters challenging elections rules (Tierney Sneed, CNN) Justice Amy Coney Barrett hasn’t disappointed conservative supporters—so far (Mark Walsh, ABA Journal) The Constitution Is Broken and Should Not Be Reclaimed (Ryan D. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 3:13 am by Ellena Erskine
Here’s the Wednesday morning read: White House tells Supreme Court diversity at West Point key to winning wars (Kelsey Reichmann, Courthouse News Service)  Abortion Pill Supreme Court Case Gets Wave of Support for FDA (Ian Lopez, Bloomberg Law) Exclusive: UNC pays anti-affirmative action group $4.8 million after US Supreme Court loss (Nate Raymond, Reuters) ACLU warns Supreme Court that lower court abortion pill decisions relied on “patently unreliable witnesses” (Melissa… [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 10:00 pm by Sherica Celine
Federal: The NLRB holds that an employer violated the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) when it discharged an employee for refusing to remove the hand-drawn letters “BLM”—the acronym for Black Lives Matter—from their work apron, finding that the employee’s refusal to remove the BLM marking was a protected concerted activity under Section 7 of the NLRA. [read post]