Search for: "Mark Fam"
Results 61 - 80
of 114
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Apr 2023, 5:52 am
Re Blagdon Cemetery [2002] Fam 299] that a simple error in administration, such as burial in the wrong grave, the exact circumstances here, can form a ground upon which a faculty for exhumation can be granted. [read post]
23 Feb 2014, 4:14 pm
But in covering the case of RS v SS [2013] EWHC B33 (Fam) he’s done just that. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 7:20 am
” Among other things, the appellant relied on an “often misleadingly selective, reading of the record” and “a marked lack of fam iliarity with the relevant law. [read post]
14 Aug 2010, 1:45 pm
Fam. [read post]
21 Jan 2024, 12:05 am
The general rule enunciated by the Court of Arches in Re Blagdon Cemetery [2002] Fam 299 is that because of the theological principle that Christian burial is final, a faculty for exhumation will only be granted in exceptional circumstances [5]. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 2:59 pm
Child & Fam. [read post]
1 Jun 2013, 7:22 am
Mark Twain “A notícia sobre minha morte foi bastante exagerada”, declarou (bastante vivo, obrigado) Mark Twain. [read post]
1 Jun 2013, 7:22 am
Mark Twain “A notícia sobre minha morte foi bastante exagerada”, declarou (bastante vivo, obrigado) Mark Twain. [read post]
19 Dec 2018, 4:36 pm
That draft guidance was deprecated by Mr Justice Hayden at the time in a case called Re J (A Minor) [2016] EWHC 2595 (Fam) : 37. [read post]
3 Nov 2022, 1:45 am
Reburials of human remains disturbed in the same cemetery: In Re St Mary’s Barnes [1982] 1 WLR 531, Southwark Consistory Court, which was approved obiter by the Court of Arches In Re St Michael and All Angels, Tettenhall Regis [1996] Fam 44, Both of these passages were cited by the Court of Arches, without adverse comment, in the second Spitalfields judgment, “and therefore there seems no reason to question its accuracy as a correct expression of the law”. [read post]
4 Nov 2022, 8:34 am
Reburials of human remains disturbed in the same cemetery: In Re St Mary’s Barnes [1982] 1 WLR 531, Southwark Consistory Court, which was approved obiter by the Court of Arches In Re St Michael and All Angels, Tettenhall Regis [1996] Fam 44, Both of these passages were cited by the Court of Arches, without adverse comment, in the second Spitalfields judgment, “and therefore there seems no reason to question its accuracy as a correct expression of the law”. [read post]
4 Nov 2022, 8:44 am
Reburials of human remains disturbed in the same cemetery: In Re St Mary’s Barnes [1982] 1 WLR 531, Southwark Consistory Court, which was approved obiter by the Court of Arches In Re St Michael and All Angels, Tettenhall Regis [1996] Fam 44, Both of these passages were cited by the Court of Arches, without adverse comment, in the second Spitalfields judgment, “and therefore there seems no reason to question its accuracy as a correct expression of the law”. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 2:18 pm
(Fam. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 11:25 am
In my previous blog entry, I posted my proposal for amendments to the Indian Child Welfare Act. [read post]
1 Dec 2022, 12:30 am
The illegality came to light when PDAS approached the present incumbent for permission for a stone to mark the interments. [read post]
28 Feb 2015, 3:15 pm
All the files I could find in chambers either said “A4″ on them or were identical in size to those marked with “A4″ (phew). [read post]
29 Aug 2023, 12:15 am
Alkmund, Duffield [2013] Fam 158 [read post]
9 May 2022, 1:00 am
In March 2015 we posted Reservation of burial space, which considered Re All Saints Heathfield [2013] Chichester Const Ct, Mark Hill Ch. where there were only “four or five” spaces remaining and Re St. [read post]
4 Oct 2013, 6:24 am
That bracketed paragraph is what saves the pithy threshold and drags it just back to the right side of the line marked “useful and fair”. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 3:17 am
At an event marking the first anniversary of the “Libel Reform Campaign”, Justice minister Lord McNally said that English libel law is “not fit for purpose”. [read post]
