Search for: "Mark v. Long"
Results 61 - 80
of 8,717
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Feb 2018, 2:52 am
Rust keeps long hours – seemingly these judges also do. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 4:30 am
Viking's appeal to the Højesteret was stayed so that the court could get a preliminary ruling from the ECJ on the following questions: ‘(1) Is Article 5, in conjunction with Article 7, of [Trade Mark Directive 89/104, long-repealed now by Directive 2008/95 but still religiously cited wherever possible] to be interpreted in such a way that company B is guilty of an infringement of a trade mark if it fills gas bottles which originate from… [read post]
30 Mar 2022, 1:21 pm
This was the precise issue discussed in The Boeing Co. v. [read post]
29 Mar 2015, 7:27 am
Colombia has the lead so far with international cases [Ann Taylor, Resolución 65875, Superintendencia de Industria y Comercio Colombia; Timberland Company v Stanton & Cia SA, Case 2002-3003-01], with one even being decided by the Andean Community Court of Justice [Nautica, Proceso No.26-IP-97. [read post]
11 May 2018, 1:24 am
Evid. 801(c) and 803; Safer, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 7:48 am
Matthew Forys is the chief of staff at Landmark Legal Foundation, which filed an amicus brief in support of Mark Janus in Janus v. [read post]
18 Mar 2022, 5:05 am
This case ABP Technology Ltd v Voyetra Turtle Beach, Inc. [read post]
23 Jul 2014, 8:00 am
The case is Siegel v. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 8:00 am
The following applications were filed with the USPTO on the very day (June 19th) that the Matal v. [read post]
14 Nov 2007, 5:20 am
[www.oranous.com][www.oranous.com]UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION MARK DEAN SCHWAB, Plaintiff, v. [read post]
27 Jun 2020, 10:15 am
Some however, were blocked or cancelled (including the Washington Redskins mark) on that basis before the Supreme Court held the bar unconstitutional in Matal v. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 8:51 am
ART v OHIM, and C-196/11, Formula One Licensing v OHIM; see also the judgment of 12 June 2020, C-705/17, Hansson), the CJEU has sent a clear message about the “value” of these marks to trademark offices and courts, and there is room for hope that weak marks will stop being TMDs in future assessments of likelihood of confusion under EU trademark law…. [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 2:41 am
Dreamwell, Ltd. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 3:59 pm
Justice Kagan with opinion in Iancu v. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 9:04 am
Iancu v. [read post]
1 Dec 2015, 10:14 am
Supreme Court oral argument in Green v. [read post]
18 Dec 2015, 12:03 pm
In Gordon v. [read post]
10 Jul 2015, 7:24 am
Consumer surveys have long been denegrated by Courts as being of little use in trade mark cases to establish likelihood of confusion. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 12:04 pm
West v. [read post]
16 Dec 2008, 1:31 pm
Power Co. v. [read post]
