Search for: "Mark v. Mark" Results 61 - 80 of 34,349
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jun 2024, 11:21 pm by Frank Cranmer
” This, of course, comes in the wake of the decision in R (on the Application of TTT) v Michaela School [2024] EWHC 843 (Admin), on which we published a critical guest post by Russell Sandberg, here. [read post]
8 Jun 2024, 9:52 am by Yosi Yahoudai
The mission “marked the first manned flight of the Saturn V, the first time that humans had left Earth’s gravity, the first humans to travel to the moon and fall under the gravitational pull of a celestial body other than Earth, and the first humans to see the Earth rise over the horizon of another celestial body,” according to the Heritage Flight Museum. [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 6:12 am by Keith Mallinson
As stated by the judges’ decisions in Unwired Planet v Huawei and TCL v Ericsson, respectively: “Based on my assessment of both experts, I am sure the disagreement represents cases in which reasonable people can differ. [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 5:30 am by Josh Blackman
My opening remarks are from about the 10 minute mark till the 20 minute mark. [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 5:11 am by Michael Oykhman
Examples of acts which have, in the past, met the actus reus standard for a section 86 offence include: Storing a firearm in a glovebox (see: R v Patrick, 2007 CanLII 7579 (ONSC)) Storing a firearm in a dresser (see: R v McDonald, 2016 BCSC 1648 (CanLII)) Storing a firearm by a furnace (see: R v Roussel, 2014 ABQB 202 (CanLII)) The Guilty Mind (Mens Rea) The mens rea or the guilty mind speaks to the accused’s degree of intent during the argued commission of the… [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 10:30 pm by Alessandro Marcia
It will thus retrace the different political, legislative, and judicial developments occurred, which have been marked as relevant for, or targeted to, LGBTIQA+ persons. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 11:36 am by Francis Pileggi
The justices unanimously reversed the Court of Chancery’s decision that the transaction met the standard Khan v. [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 9:23 am by Marcel Pemsel
The applicant relied on the AS v Deutsches Patent- und Markenamt judgment of the Court of Justice of the EU (case C‑541/18, IPKat here). [read post]