Search for: "Mark v. Michael, et al"
Results 61 - 80
of 518
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jul 2021, 4:16 pm
Code §230 - Protection for private blocking and screening of offensive materialDonald Trump et. al. v. [read post]
6 Jul 2021, 8:10 am
Attorney Gen. v. [read post]
4 Jul 2021, 6:41 am
Pix Credit: The Apotheosis of George Washington; US Capitol Building Washington DCThe 4th day of July has been set aside in our Republic for the celebration of the signing of the Declaration of Independence by the members of the Second Continental Congress at that moment in rebellion against the authority of the King in Parliament of Great Britain and Ireland, whose subjects they then were. [read post]
22 Mar 2021, 5:01 am
Michael Gallagher and Ruben Gallego. [read post]
14 Jan 2021, 4:00 am
Where there is a marked information asymmetry between a service provider and client, it is all too easy for consumers to be taken advantage of with poor quality services whose value (or lack thereof) they are unable to ascertain. [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 5:54 am
Posted by Mark Limardo, Michael Neidell, and Zachary Freedman, Olshan Frome Wolosky LLP, on Tuesday, January 12, 2021 Editor's Note: Mark Limardo and Michael Neidell are partners and Zachary Freedman is a law clerk at Olshan Frome Wolosky LLP. [read post]
24 Nov 2020, 2:55 am
Pappas et al. (2007) find that counterfeit cigarettes can have as much as seven times the lead of authentic brands, and close to three times as much thallium, a toxic heavy metal.[13] Other sources report finding insect eggs, dead flies, mold, and human feces in counterfeit cigarettes.[14] During prohibition of alcohol in the United States during the 1920s, increased enforcement did not manage to significantly decrease the prevalence of bootlegging because the profit margins were… [read post]
18 Oct 2020, 4:59 pm
There was also a statement in open court in the case of Michael Turner v News Group Newspapers Limited. [read post]
3 Sep 2020, 9:42 am
Sheppard, et al., No. 13-19-00036-CV making a deep dive into when post-production costs can be deducted from the plaintiffs’ royalty. [read post]
29 Jul 2020, 8:13 am
Wise et al v. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 5:50 am
Mark and Casey file jointly. [read post]
24 May 2020, 4:06 pm
IPSO IPSO has published a number of rulings and resolutions statements since our last Round Up: 09380-19 Clattenburg v dailystar.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2019), 2 Privacy (2019), Resolved- IPSO mediation 08479-19 Forbes v express.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2019), No breach- after investigation 08417-19 Cooney et al. v The Times, 1 Accuracy (2019), Breach- sanction: action as offered by publication 08376-19 Malone v The Scotsman, 1 Accuracy (2019), 2 Privacy… [read post]
13 Apr 2020, 4:19 pm
District Judge Mark Wolf of Massachusetts wrote a notable and important opinion that reached the core of the class action mechanism: Judges trust lawyers. [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 6:00 am
Pappas et al. (2007) find that counterfeit cigarettes can have as much as seven times the lead of authentic brands, and close to three times as much thallium, a toxic heavy metal.[13] Other sources report finding insect eggs, dead flies, mold, and human feces in counterfeit cigarettes.[14] During prohibition of alcohol in the United States during the 1920s, increased enforcement did not manage to significantly decrease the prevalence of bootlegging because the profit margins were… [read post]
29 Nov 2019, 4:54 pm
National Review, et al. sought certiorari on two issues. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 12:57 pm
Ocwen Financial Corporation, et al. [read post]
4 Aug 2019, 1:26 pm
” Like the story of another one of my clients by Michael Moss, “The Burger that Shattered Her Life,” I smell another Pulitzer Prize. [read post]
20 Jul 2019, 5:30 am
Khalid Sheikh Mohammad, et al. [read post]
4 Jul 2019, 2:57 am
The two cases are Pharo Gaia Fund Ltd et al. v. [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 2:17 pm
For a complainant to acquire a domain name from a registration via a UDRP proceeding, the complainant would must show that: (1) The domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the complainant has rights; (2) The domain name registrant has no rights or legitimate interests in the domain name; and (3) The domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith. [read post]
