Search for: "Mark v. Wish"
Results 61 - 80
of 2,156
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 May 2015, 6:30 am
Even if the California courts didn’t wish to go that far (this was, after all, three years before Brown v. [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 7:30 am
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
22 Jan 2020, 5:00 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2021, 4:00 am
Supreme Court yesterday denied review in Ricks v. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 11:00 pm
The ruling, G.G. v Gloucester County Sch. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 11:00 pm
The ruling, G.G. v Gloucester County Sch. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 5:00 am
In the case of Barth v. [read post]
22 Sep 2008, 11:21 am
As mentioned by Current Awareness, The Times reports today that the Court of Appeal has upheld the decision in S v S [2008] EWHC 519 (Fam), under the headline: "Ex-wife wins new home and £50,000 a year maintenance - for her horses". [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 2:18 am
" Tequila Cuervo La Rojena S.A. de C.V. v. [read post]
7 Jun 2015, 6:43 pm
In its recent June 5, 2015 decision in the case of Mason v. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 2:56 am
The South African Reserve Bank had previously required treasury approval from any South African entity wishing to transfer intellectual property offshore.Without approval the transfer of rights was null and void.In Oilwell (Pty) Ltd v Protech International Limited (noted by Afro-IP here) the Supreme Court of Appeal (SCA) confirmed that foreign exchange approval was no longer required for an assignment of trade marks. [read post]
8 Mar 2007, 8:09 am
However, if the applicant responds to the PTO immediately after receiving the search report by informing the PTO that he wishes the mark to be registered irrespective of the content of the search report the mark will usually be accepted for registration within weeks instead of awaiting the deadline.If the applicant responds immediately to the search report a national Danish trade mark application is currently processed within 3-4 months".A pretty hopeless… [read post]
6 May 2024, 3:54 am
" iFit, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Oct 2018, 8:09 am
Henry V, Act IV, scene iii If we are mark’d to die, we are enowTo do our country loss; and if to live,The fewer men, the greater share of honour.God’s will! [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 10:04 am
Interflora British Unit v Marks and Spencer PLC Flowers Direct Online Limited [2009] EWHC 1095 (Ch). [read post]
2 Jul 2008, 1:30 pm
In Viacom v. [read post]
30 May 2012, 6:20 am
Louis Vuitton Malletier, S.A. v. [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 1:59 am
“Severe frustration” a common problem for litigants, but not moral prejudiceWirex Ltd v Cryptocarbon Global Ltd [2022] EWHC 1161 (IPEC) (May 2022)In a short 31 paragraph IPEC judgment, HHJ Hacon assessed the Claimant’s entitlement to damages having previously found the Defendants liable for trade mark infringement. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 8:06 am
The letter also comes at the unfortunate time of the first day of the European Qualifying Examinations (EQEs).The IPKat wishes everyone the best of luck! [read post]
18 Nov 2022, 12:42 am
One should therefore particularly bear the associated risks in mind should they wish to apply for such trade marks or use such signs in the course of trade. [read post]
