Search for: "Marker v. State" Results 61 - 80 of 559
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
The employer had mistakenly assumed that their original notice of dismissal given in May 2018 served as the marker for the beginning of the employee’s notice period, resulting in a 17-month notice period. [read post]
13 Apr 2022, 5:36 pm
I am delighted to share the video recording of the  event recently sponsored by the Penn State Law Federalist Society: "Natural Law and the US Constitutional Order" which was held at Penn State law 12 April 2022. [read post]
20 Mar 2022, 6:09 am by Kevin LaCroix
In its financial release, the company stated that the revenue declined as the company “preemptively invested to grow driver supply to support strong recovery in mobility demand. [read post]
11 Mar 2022, 4:22 am by Oscar Davies and Jack Castle
In R (on the application of Elan-Cane) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2021] UKSC 56, [2021] All ER (D) 53 (Dec), the Supreme Court found there was no positive obligation on the state to provide the option of an ‘X’ gender category on passports. [read post]
20 Feb 2022, 4:38 am
 Claude Monet, Turkeys Unfinished Decoration 1876 Musée D'OrsayThe object, then, is to try to rationalize an order to the quite dynamic states of norm-regulation construction in the many spaces that exist above, beyond or between states. [read post]
17 Feb 2022, 8:36 am by Anna Lvovsky
Beginning even before the Supreme Court’s 1966 ruling in Miranda v. [read post]
1 Feb 2022, 7:30 am by Kelly Goles
He would later go on to successfully argue the case of Brown v. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 1:49 pm by ACLU
When it comes to other issues involving the separation of church and state, the administration supported the state of Maine’s right to refuse funding for religious education in a recent Supreme Court case. [read post]
16 Dec 2021, 12:02 pm by ACLU
The ban was the subject of multiple lawsuits including Stone v. [read post]
15 Dec 2021, 4:27 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
It is clear that this is a matter in which states would be afforded a high degree of latitude by the European Court, having regard to the absence of any consensus amongst the states which are parties to the Convention, the complexity and sensitivity of the issue, and the need for a balance to be struck between competing private and public interests. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 2:34 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
  Basfar v Wong, heard 13th-14th October  Her Majesty’s Attorney General v Crosland, heard 18th October  Secretary of State for the Home Department v SC (Jamaica), heard 19th October  Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs v Coal Staff Superannuation Scheme Trustees Ltd, heard 26th October  Harpur Trust v Brazel, heard… [read post]