Search for: "Marker v. United States" Results 61 - 80 of 270
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 May 2020, 11:30 am by Josh Blackman
If the President knowingly accepted prohibited emoluments from the States or the United States, then he could be impeached. [read post]
15 May 2020, 6:20 am by INFORRM
There are two judgments : A Local Authority v The Mother & Ors [2020] EWFC 38 (11 May 2020) and A Local Authority v The Mother & Ors [2020] EWHC 1162 (Fam) (11 May 2020). [read post]
17 Mar 2020, 1:32 pm by Noble McIntyre
Cordis SUPER TORQUE MB Angiographic Catheter with Radiopaque Marker Bands has been recalled by Cordis Corporation because the marker bands may move or dislodge during use. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 8:50 am by Kari Hong
People were permitted to enter the United States to wait for an immigration hearing. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 11:38 am by David Cole
 Ohio is one of three states that refuse to update the gender marker on birth certificates for people who have transitioned to live their true gender. [read post]
14 Oct 2019, 6:00 am by Brian Gallini
The Supreme Court’s decision in Minnesota v. [read post]
6 Sep 2019, 11:43 am
(Plutarch, The Fall of the Roman Republic, Sulla, ¶ 31).In the West it has long been common for leaders of states (or those whose leadership guides the state) to establish proscription lists. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Section One straightforwardly provides: The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex.Moving beyond the bare text, it is important, even (maybe especially) a hundred years later, to think more about what the Amendment really sought to constitutionally accomplish, and how its full import has not been deeply understood. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 12:13 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
For much of the movement, it’s not just that church and state should be tight partners but also that the United States is and should be a Christian country. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 6:30 am by Mark Graber
United States (1926) claimed that the Supreme Court should not treat as an important precedent the Tenure of Office Act of 1867 because everyone knew Reconstruction was a time in which Republicans were engaged in pure politics. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 12:20 pm by David Markus
Neither Wisconsin nor the United States has introduced data sufficient to show that disarming all nonviolent felons substantially advances its interest in keeping the public safe. [read post]
30 Jan 2019, 2:26 pm by Lee E. Berlik
” The court found the tweet was not actionable “because the tweet in question constitutes ‘rhetorical hyperbole’ normally associated with politics and public discourse in the United States. [read post]