Search for: "Marks v. Goodding"
Results 61 - 80
of 12,111
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Mar 2024, 2:30 am
The first case involved the claim by Marks and Spencer against Aldi for infringement of the “Colin the Caterpillar” trade mark. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 12:41 pm
Citing an IARC monograph may be in itself questionable, given the IARC’s deviations from good systematic review practice. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 8:08 am
In the Court's view, the best description of the correct approach for a judge to assess evidence in trade mark infringement and passing off cases is found in Mr Justice Jacob's judgment in Neutrogena v Golden [1996] RPC 473: "The judge must consider the evidence adduced and use his own common sense and his own opinion as to the likelihood of deception. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 7:17 am
This was a good start. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 4:53 am
Murthy v. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 2:38 am
Following the decision of the House of Lords, in Macmillan Inc v. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 4:58 am
Court of Justice of the EU, Bundesverband Souvenir - Geschenke - Ehrenpreise v EUIPO, C-488/16 P, at para. 38). [read post]
24 Mar 2024, 8:50 am
This has created a market where the distinction between inspiration (homage=good) and copying (theft=bad) is sometimes difficult to apply. [read post]
23 Mar 2024, 10:13 am
That is the gist of the decision in Fraserview Remanufacturing Inc. v. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 7:04 am
From Erikson v. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 8:24 pm
Taking the third of these reasons first, business model innovations are one good reason for parties to seek greater legal certainty. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 7:47 am
See Textron Inc. v. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 12:13 pm
Derived from the case United States v. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 7:44 am
To mark the occasion, I wanted to share some of the project’s inside story, reflect on its impact and look ahead to what I hope this data will make possible in the future. [read post]
17 Mar 2024, 9:26 am
That would be certainly a possibility as not only the Berne Convention (Article 2(3)) mandates the protection of inter alia “other alterations of … artistic work”, but derivative works have been also held protectable under UK law (think of the famous Hyperion Records v Sawkins [IPKat here] as an example). [read post]
17 Mar 2024, 7:59 am
So, if you're going to make a new wine, it might be a good idea to put it in new bottles. [read post]
16 Mar 2024, 1:01 am
In Fletcher v. [read post]
15 Mar 2024, 3:41 am
MHCS v. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 7:15 am
And that’s almost certainly a good thing. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 3:51 am
Nu Science Corporation v. [read post]
