Search for: "Marks v. Department of Public Safety " Results 61 - 80 of 556
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Feb 2023, 9:30 pm by Public Employment Law Press
[FN1] It is well settled that, "[u]nder FOIL, agency records are presumptively available for public inspection" (Matter of Empire Ch. of Associated Bldrs. and Contractors, Inc. v New York State Dept. of Transportation, ___ AD3d ___, ___, 2022 NY Slip Op 06852, *1 [3d Dept 2022] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]). [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 9:30 pm by Public Employment Law Press
[FN1] It is well settled that, "[u]nder FOIL, agency records are presumptively available for public inspection" (Matter of Empire Ch. of Associated Bldrs. and Contractors, Inc. v New York State Dept. of Transportation, ___ AD3d ___, ___, 2022 NY Slip Op 06852, *1 [3d Dept 2022] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]). [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 11:42 am by Lyle Denniston
MacLean — rights of federal employee who disclosed sensitive information regarding a public safety issue Jesinoski v. [read post]
2 Jun 2009, 12:23 am
With this change, we can hopefully avoid what NTSB Chairman Mark V. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 9:01 am by Camilla Alexandra Hrdy
Once the PTO approves the proposed standard, the owner of the mark would be charged with policing uses of the mark. [read post]
25 Nov 2021, 11:15 am by Denis Stearns
So let’s look at this case that Ronholm cites—American Public Health Association v. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 8:47 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
New York City Department of Education, a summary order decided on May 31. [read post]
24 Oct 2018, 9:45 pm by Andrew Hudson
The usefulness of this scheme at stopping parallel imports has reduced as a result of the introduction of s122A however it in our view it should be pursued to stop counterfeit goods at the border; if a brand owner has concerns that parallel imports of its brand or product present a risk to public health and safety, we can work with the Department of Home Affairs and the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission to investigate the issue; limiting warranty and service… [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 10:41 pm by Steven Hansen
This "proposed amendment" is set for a mark up meeting this week. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 1:09 pm by brian
 (Those jurisdictions are the Counties of Mesa, Phoenix, Florence, Pima, Pinal, and Yavapai, as well as the Arizona Department of Corrections and Arizona Department of Public Safety. [read post]