Search for: "Marks v. Howe"
Results 61 - 80
of 14,115
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Feb 2011, 11:49 am
It might sound trite, by you'd be surprised how many people get it wrong.2. [read post]
"Marriage Equality May Soon Be in Peril: How the Supreme Court could overturn Obergefell v. Hodges."
5 Jul 2017, 7:25 pm
"Marriage Equality May Soon Be in Peril: How the Supreme Court could overturn Obergefell v. [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 7:34 am
Interflora British Unit v Marks and Spencer PLC Flowers Direct Online Limited [2009] EWHC 1095 (Ch) (IPKat post here), the English Court of Appeal examined in detail the nature and role of survey evidence. [read post]
3 Dec 2021, 4:30 am
MG Financial, LLC v. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 2:17 am
This raises our first question – how does one claim to be the owner of a trade mark? [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 2:17 am
This raises our first question – how does one claim to be the owner of a trade mark? [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 4:13 pm
Co. v. [read post]
12 May 2011, 2:19 am
It is rather a messy deal how Symbion came to license its trade mark to the corporate group of which Idameneo was a member. [read post]
18 Apr 2013, 9:41 am
How to get your jeans to fit here Fading jeans here [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 2:15 pm
V., 140 S. [read post]
26 May 2011, 6:02 pm
The Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) issued its eagerly awaited decision in Masterpiece Inc. v. [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 3:06 am
Wise F&I, LLC; Financial Gap, Administrator LLC; Vehicle Service Administrator LLC; and Administration America LLC v. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 1:05 am
Trade mark dilution has not been found in the U.S. when a famous mark is used for parody (Louis Vuitton Malletier v Haute Diggity Dog, LLC., 464 F. [read post]
2 Mar 2017, 6:47 am
The Singapore Court of Appeal in Societe Des Produits Nestlé SA and anor v Petra Foods Limited and anor [2016] SGCA 64 recently affirmed a previous High Court decision that Nestlé’s two-finger and four-finger shape marks (the “Shape Marks”) are not registrable. [read post]
28 Dec 2016, 6:04 am
It's hard to imagine polo causing any sort of trade mark disputeThe question was essentially how far did each licence go both in terms of time and the products in question. [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 12:16 am
Lidl did not put forth precisely how the graphic representation contradicts the description. [read post]
1 May 2020, 4:24 am
When examining whether there had been misrepresentation, the Deputy Judge noted the importance of the broader context of use of the mark in the passing off claim, and how (barring the icon itself) there was significant use of Photobox branding, which would dispel any potential for actual confusion. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 6:00 am
In Forest Group Inc. v. [read post]
15 Mar 2022, 4:13 am
TTABlog comment: How did you do? [read post]
4 Apr 2007, 12:27 am
ITC Limited v. [read post]
