Search for: "Marks v. USA"
Results 61 - 80
of 1,895
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Feb 2008, 6:27 am
Philip Morris USA, where the jury originally awarded a land-mark $28 billion (yes - billion with a "B") punitive damages award against Philip Morris. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 2:55 pm
Supreme Court oral argument in Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC v. [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 1:25 pm
In Brinkmeier v. [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 5:40 am
€ 160 The post USA: Sonix Technology Company, Ltd. v. [read post]
16 Oct 2023, 3:35 am
Advance Magazine Publishers Inc. v. [read post]
8 Mar 2007, 8:09 am
However, if the applicant responds to the PTO immediately after receiving the search report by informing the PTO that he wishes the mark to be registered irrespective of the content of the search report the mark will usually be accepted for registration within weeks instead of awaiting the deadline.If the applicant responds immediately to the search report a national Danish trade mark application is currently processed within 3-4 months".A pretty hopeless appeal… [read post]
15 May 2012, 3:07 am
PRL USA Holdings Inc. v. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 5:32 am
The federal district court in Miami erred in awarding summary judgment for a title insurance company regarding its use of the mark ‘FOREMOST,’ the U.S. [read post]
27 Aug 2022, 1:49 am
The district court’s denial of a preliminary injunction was affirmed (Sunless, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 3:21 am
Simonian v. [read post]
21 Jun 2008, 8:03 am
, um eine markenrechtserhebliche markenmäßige Benutzung handelt - vgl. bspw. die Entscheidungen der Oberlandesgerichte Stuttgart (Urt. v. 26.07.2007 - 2 U 23/07), Köln (Urt. v. 31.08.2007 - 6 U 48/07), München (Urt. v. 6.12.2007 - 29 U 4013/07) und Frankfurt (Urt. v. 26.02.2008 - 6 W 17/08) - ist man in den USA schon einen Schritt weiter. [read post]
16 Oct 2018, 6:08 am
More from our authors: Mediation: Creating Value in International Intellectual Property Disputes by Théophile Margellos, Sophia Bonne, Gordon Humphreys, Sven Stürmann € Design Rights, Functionality and Scope of Protection by Chris Carani€ 199 The post USA: Real Foods Pty Ltd. v. [read post]
17 Nov 2023, 6:35 am
Further, VICC failed to establish that its two marks had acquired secondary meaning (VI Carnival Committee Inc. v. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 3:03 pm
This morning the Court heard oral argument in King v. [read post]
18 Apr 2018, 7:24 pm
More from our authors: Mediation: Creating Value in International Intellectual Property Disputes by Théophile Margellos, Sophia Bonne, Gordon Humphreys, Sven Stürmann € Design Rights, Functionality and Scope of Protection by Chris Carani€ 199 The post USA: Phoenix Entertainment Partners, LLC v. [read post]
9 Mar 2017, 5:53 am
University Loft Co. v. [read post]
9 Apr 2017, 11:58 pm
Two recent decisions show the various ways in which it is possible to win on appeal and the likelihood of such an appeal being successful.IWATCH - Apple Inc v Arcadia Trading LimitedArcadia opposed Apple's application for IWATCH on the basis that it was (1) made in bad faith because it was filed in the name of Brightflash USA LLC and later assigned to Apple, and (2) descriptive or devoid of distinctive character in relation to Class 9 (computers, software, electronics… [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 9:28 am
Heathcote Holdings Corp. v. [read post]
26 Dec 2007, 4:59 am
Lloyd Lifestyle Ltd. v. [read post]
31 Jan 2022, 6:48 am
The court, affirming in a nonprecedential decision the cancellation of the registration for the BF-7 mark, found that substantial evidence supported the Board’s finding that another Korean company, and not the trademark holder, actually used the mark in commerce (Sunbio Corp. v.Biogrand Co., Ltd., December 14, 2021, Stoll, K.). [read post]
