Search for: "Marks v. United States Department of Justice"
Results 61 - 80
of 1,593
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jan 2022, 4:46 am
The first case, United States v. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 10:17 am
By the Kean Miller State and Local Tax Team On June 21, 2018, the Supreme Court of the United States issued its opinion in South Dakota v. [read post]
19 Oct 2022, 12:06 pm
The location is still San Francisco, of course.This has already been confirmed by counsel for the parties as well as the United States Department Of Justice. [read post]
3 Dec 2021, 12:20 pm
Both the Department of Homeland Security and the Department of Justice have the legal authority to grant adjustment of status depending on whether a person is in deportation (formally known as “removal”) proceedings. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 4:05 pm
Following the recommendation of the Justice Department, the United States Supreme Court accepted the petition for writ of certiorari to determine whether, under Sections 32(1)(a) and 43(a)(1)(A) of the Lanham Act, the owner of a U.S. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 4:05 pm
Following the recommendation of the Justice Department, the United States Supreme Court accepted the petition for writ of certiorari to determine whether, under Sections 32(1)(a) and 43(a)(1)(A) of the Lanham Act, the owner of a U.S. [read post]
29 May 2019, 8:14 am
In Mission Product Holdings v. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 10:44 am
Department of Justice, and was recently appointed to oversee the entire Antitrust Division. [read post]
20 Feb 2018, 7:30 am
In addition to the composition of the court, one other thing has changed in the two years since the justices last heard oral argument on the agency-fee question: the position of the United States. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 3:26 am
United States v. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 3:18 pm
And in Texas Department of Parks & Wildlife v. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 7:20 am
Any private entity that believes someone is using an expired or invalid patent can file a criminal lawsuit in the name of the United States, without getting approval from or even notifying the Department of Justice. [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 12:35 pm
Government has recently shown an increased interest in pursuing customs fraud cases, and the United States Department of Justice filed an amicus curiae (friend of the court) brief in the case in support of the whistleblower’s position on the question of whether marking duties could be recovered under the False Claims Act. [read post]
13 Jun 2009, 4:04 pm
" Id.The issue also includes a case note on the United States v. [read post]
10 Oct 2007, 10:59 pm
Justice Shaw=s opinion, which was joined by the other dissenting Justices, pointed out that the electric chair was running an 11% botch rate. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 6:41 am
United States and United States v. [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 4:50 pm
States. [read post]
24 May 2011, 12:27 pm
United States and Hirabayashi v. [read post]
5 May 2022, 10:38 am
Asbill [5/5/22] On February 22, 2022, the Supreme Court of the United States asked the United States Department of Justice to weigh in on an issue that has divided state courts in recent years: should states with laws requiring insurers and employers to compensate medical marijuana users for the costs of their cannabis be given deference superior to federal drug policy? [read post]
14 Sep 2018, 10:58 am
And the Justice Department obtained another FARA conviction in May, in the case of United States v. [read post]
