Search for: "Marquis v. Marquis"
Results 61 - 80
of 105
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Sep 2011, 2:32 pm
Marquis Jet Partners, Inc. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 3:10 am
Through Coffey’s involvment with the Elian Gonzalez trial to its surprising connection to Bush v. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 2:46 am
As an example,in Banister v Marquis ; 2011 NY Slip Op 06544 ; Decided on September 20, 2011 ; Appellate Division, Second Department we see the following: "Contrary to the plaintiffs' contention, the trial court providently exercised its discretion in precluding them from calling an expert radiologist to testify. [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 10:49 am
Marquis, No. 1136 of 2008 and No. 5136 of 2008 (Luz. [read post]
28 May 2011, 9:35 pm
--Duc de Saint-Simon, "Portrait of the Marquis de Villars, Memoires 15 (GF Flammarion 2001) (Delphine de Garidel, ed.) [read post]
28 May 2011, 6:00 am
Washington Post, et al., better known as Rakofsky v. [read post]
5 May 2011, 11:35 am
Shane Marquis, No. 100,423 (Butler)Probation revocation appeal (petition for review)Matthew J. [read post]
3 May 2011, 3:12 pm
The issue did not get the marquis position in the briefs, but it appeared to be quite material, not only to the jury but also to the appeals court panel. [read post]
25 Jul 2010, 7:54 pm
See Pretka v. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 3:16 am
Corp. v United States, 231 F Supp 184 [D Del 1964];). [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 10:31 am
United States v. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 9:50 am
Marquis, No. 100,423 (Kan. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 5:38 am
United States v. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 10:24 am
However, Smith remains the law, and CLS v. [read post]
10 Dec 2009, 9:40 am
Regina v Horncastle and anotherl; ReginaMarquis and another [2009] UKSC 14; [2009] WLR (D) 358 "Provided the provisions of the Criminal Justice Act 2003 were observed, a defendant’s right to a fair trial, guaranteed art 6(3)(d) of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, as scheduled to the Human Rights Act 1998, [...] [read post]
10 Dec 2009, 2:02 am
Regina v Horncastle and Another; Regina v Marquis and Another Supreme Court "A defendant’s right to a fair trial guaranteed by article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights would not be violated where his conviction was based solely or to a decisive extent on the statement of an absent witness, provided that the provisions of [...] [read post]
11 Nov 2009, 3:29 am
Florida and Graham v. [read post]
16 Jul 2009, 3:42 am
Franklin and State v. [read post]
3 Jun 2009, 1:19 am
Regina v Horncastle; Regina v Blackmore; Regina v Marquis; Regina v Graham; Regina v Carter Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) “A criminal trial could be fair although the defence did not have the opportunity of examining every prosecution witness. [read post]
28 May 2009, 2:00 am
R v Horncastle and another; R v Marquis and another; R v Carter [2009] EWCA Crim 964; [2009] WLR (D) 173 “There would be no breach of art 6, and in particular art 6(3)(d), of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, if a criminal conviction were based solely or to [...] [read post]
