Search for: "Marshall v Territory" Results 61 - 80 of 262
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Sep 2021, 7:06 am by Pete Strom
WHEREAS, it is well recognized that SARS-CoV-2 the virus that causes the disease COVID-19 presents a public health concern that requires extraordinary protective measures and vigilance; and, WHEREAS, on March 11, 2020, the World Health Organization declared a world-wide pandemic; and, WHEREAS, on March 13, 2020, the President of the United States declared a National Emergency for the United States and its territories in an effort to reduce the spread of the virus; and, WHEREAS, the COVID-19… [read post]
8 Sep 2021, 9:30 pm by ernst
As Chief Justice Marshall explained in Bank of the United States v. [read post]
26 Jul 2021, 4:12 am by Michael Douglas
Epic’s complaint against Apple is the same as in the US, the EU and the UK, but with the addition of a territorial connection, ie developers of apps for use on Australian iOS devices must only distribute their apps through Apple’s Australian App Store and only use Apple’s in-app payment processing system. [read post]
4 May 2021, 4:23 pm by Sandy Levinson
  There may be mention of Marshall's dictum about their being "domestic dependent sovereigns,' but that is usually it. [read post]
28 Apr 2021, 10:49 am by Unknown
H.R.2644 - To provide direct funding to local, Tribal, and territorial governments to establish Green New Deal programs and initiatives, and for other purposes. [read post]
18 Dec 2020, 1:42 pm by Sonia Gill
  Help Advance Legislation to Protect Voting Rights Voting Rights Advancement ActIn 2013, the Supreme Court gutted the Voting Rights Act in Shelby County v. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 2:18 pm by Kevin LaCroix
”[v] This means compliance must be shown not only for plaintiff Jones but also for every offer and every sale in the “offering. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 5:01 am by Michael Ramsey
Generally, Marshall said, a nation had jurisdiction over all people and things within its territory. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 5:01 am by Michael Ramsey
Generally, Marshall said, a nation had jurisdiction over all people and things within its territory. [read post]
27 Oct 2020, 5:01 am by Michael Ramsey
Chief Justice Marshall considered the matter directly in Loughborough v. [read post]
27 Oct 2020, 5:01 am by Michael Ramsey
Chief Justice Marshall considered the matter directly in Loughborough v. [read post]
[v] The negotiating history of the SCM Agreement suggests that the focus of the SCM Agreement was on addressing trade-distorting subsidies offered by Members in their own ‘territories’. [read post]