Search for: "Martin v. Rice" Results 61 - 80 of 86
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 May 2011, 5:00 am by Kevin
From a complaint filed last week in San Francisco:  Michael M ____ v. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 8:57 am by J. Michael Goodson Law Library
But when restaurateur Jay Oh noticed leftover nuggets of rice on Martin’s plate, he argued that Martin should be charged the higher price for sashimi (raw fish without rice) than for nigiri (raw fish served atop a hand-packed wad of vinegared rice). [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 6:08 pm
Happy V-Day, everyone.This feed originates at the personal blog of Scott Lincicome (http://lincicome.blogspot.com). [read post]
Rice, D-Portsmouth; Edith Ajello, D-Providence; Roberto DaSilva, D-East Providence; Rodney Driver, D-Richmond; Robert Flaherty, D-Warwick; Donald Lally, D-Narragansett; Peter Martin, D-Newport; Brian Newberry, R-North Smithfield; Peter Palumbo, D-Cranston, and Scott Pollard, D-Foster. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 3:44 pm by admin
The following is a summary review of articles from all over the nation concerning environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
15 Jan 2010, 10:11 am by Chuck Ramsay
Rice, Jon Berglund, Mark Kelly, Mark Ring, Jeffrey Bernlohr, Andrew Kenly, Rich Risk, David J. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 10:44 am
(Methuen, MA; Albert Martin, President) Alex Truck, Inc. [read post]
15 Sep 2008, 11:37 pm
Rosado cross-moved for summary judgment and for a declaration deeming Hartford to have consented to the $25,000 settlement.In denying summary judgment to both parties, Kings County Supreme Court Justice Larry Martin held that questions of fact existed with respect to whether Rosado was "occupying" the subject vehicle at the time of his accident:In the seminal case construing the parameters of the term "occupying" as it is used in SUM endorsements, Matter of Rice… [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 9:47 am
Martin, No. 06-5605 A conviction and sentence for drug- and firearm-related offenses is affirmed primarily where the district court's permitting a police officer to testify as both an expert and a fact witness, without the issuance of a cautionary instruction to the jury, did not constitute reversible error under US v. [read post]
5 Jan 2008, 2:12 pm
So… to calm things down, I am able to state that there are no known ‘unusual antics’ being reported by Martin George and colleagues at Conflict of Laws.net, by Jeremy Philips and colleagues at IPKat (Intellectual property) or Alex and his colleagues over at IMPACT; an excellent law rich blog by leading Midlands firm, Freeth Cartwright. [read post]