Search for: "Martinez v. Department of Justice" Results 61 - 80 of 201
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Mar 2012, 3:10 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The Second Department holds: The 120-day service provision of CPLR 306-b can be extended by a court, upon motion  " upon good cause shown or in the interest of justice (CPLR 306-b). [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 4:00 am by David Markus
United States, a Massachusetts case, the justices have been asked to determine whether they meant what they wrote about juries and drug sentences in Alleyne v. [read post]
28 Mar 2016, 12:21 pm by Lyle Denniston
The Justice Department opposed review, but the Court agreed to hear the case, limited to the “collateral estoppel” question. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 2:55 pm by Tom Goldstein
Martinez authorized universities in certain circumstances to deny funding to student groups that exclude certain students from membership. [read post]
24 Jun 2017, 2:58 am
Justice Ravita Choudhury then posed a long question premised on Roemer v. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 6:40 am by Marissa Miller
Cooper, and Martinez v. [read post]
18 Oct 2009, 5:59 pm
Van Hook (09-144) United States Defense Department v. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 7:53 am by Adam Chandler
Also at the Blog of LegalTimes, Mike Scarcella reports on the latest developments in the corruption prosecution of former Jack Abramoff associate Kevin Ring; in that case, the Justice Department has argued that the Court’s decision in Skilling v. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 8:00 am by Russell Spivak
District Court for the District of Columbia on Feb. 22: a Joint Status Report (alongside the Department of Justice), a motion in limine, and a prehearing brief. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 1:42 pm by John Elwood
The Justices awarded relist gold to the petitioner in Hinton v. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 7:46 pm
Martinez (08-1371) – originally Conference 10.19 Manning v. [read post]
19 Sep 2020, 8:30 am by Tia Sewell, Anna Salvatore
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit’s Sept. 2 decision on United States v. [read post]