Search for: "Martinez v. State of Texas"
Results 61 - 80
of 257
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Apr 2017, 7:46 am
And unlike Martinez and the subsequent decision in Trevino v. [read post]
25 Aug 2007, 1:06 pm
Martinez-Aguero v. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 8:03 am
More on Martinez v. [read post]
26 Mar 2023, 8:53 am
" Texas v. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 5:11 pm
STATE OF TEXAS; from Bexar County; 7th district (07-07-00274-CV, ___ SW3d ___, 08-28-07)08-0058 TAMMY ELKINS v. [read post]
23 Nov 2008, 11:49 am
The Circular Letter rests its authority on the New York Appellate Division, Fourth Department, ruling on February 1, 2008, in the case of Martinez v. [read post]
25 Jul 2022, 7:44 am
” Plus, the district court had reexamined other parts of the claim when the case was remanded for further proceedings in light of Martinez v. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 6:09 pm
Perry Homes v Cull. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 5:11 pm
Per Curiam Opinion Links to pdf version of opinion and to Electronic Briefs in this case can be found on the Texas Supreme Court's web site Americo Life, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Apr 2007, 3:05 pm
Lawyers for the state of Texas this week urged the Supreme Court to order the dismissal of a significant death penalty case that is scheduled for argument next Wednesday afternoon, April 18 -- Panetti v. [read post]
4 May 2012, 1:11 pm
Martinez, 174 S.W. 3d. 772 (Tex. [read post]
21 May 2015, 6:16 am
The style of the case is, State Farm Life Insurance Company v. [read post]
29 Oct 2024, 8:28 am
Araque, 2023 WL 11959851, United States District Court, D. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 7:54 am
Louis Martinez, III, No. 10-0426 Shell Oil Company, et al. v. [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 11:04 am
Originally, Martinez was supposed to be only for states that had a rule saying all trial IAC claims must be brought in habeas corpus and not on direct appeal, but in Trevino v. [read post]
13 Jan 2017, 2:14 pm
Davis, No. 16-6219, involves the continuing fallout from Martinez v. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 6:34 am
Lower federal courts ruled, however, that Texas courts sometimes allow a state inmate to bring up an ineffective lawyer claim prior to a post-conviction stage, so the Martinez decision does not apply in Texas, including death-penalty cases there. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 5:30 pm
State v. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 12:51 pm
State v. [read post]
27 Sep 2008, 1:41 pm
Sep. 26, 2008)(per curiam) (condemnation appeal, State prevails)THE STATE OF TEXAS v. [read post]
