Search for: "Matter of Bellinger"
Results 61 - 80
of 139
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jul 2015, 11:46 am
But as John Bellinger explained, the Iran Resolution does not appear to obligate the United States under international law to lift domestic U.S. sanctions, and thus does not tie Congress’s hands as a matter of international law. [read post]
25 Jul 2015, 9:20 am
Meanwhile, John Bellinger considered whether the resolution places binding commitments on the United States under international law, and answered in the negative. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 5:23 am
Absent the Iran Review Act, President Obama could have lifted U.S. sanctions last week (or, for that matter, last year). [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 4:19 pm
As for potential litigation: Harris and Youssef quote John Bellinger as suggesting that the Obama Administration could find itself before the courts once more if it engages in long-term detention of ISIS fighters. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 8:10 am
(With the notable exceptions of Bobby’s piece from Tuesday on the competing policy concerns involved in long-term military detention, and an early post on the raid by John Bellinger.) [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 9:07 am
Bellinger, 86 N.C. [read post]
23 May 2015, 6:55 am
Disagreeing with them all, Bruce Schneier posted comments by the ACLU’s Chris Soghoian who argued that the current debate over Section 215 doesn’t matter that much. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 4:42 pm
Bellinger III, Arnold & Porter and former Legal Adviser to the U.S. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 11:00 pm
In February 2002, for example, even before the CIA detainee and interrogation program had formally begun, President Bush issued a memo declaring that while the Geneva Conventions do not apply to al Qaeda and Taliban detainees, US Armed Forces would nonetheless as a matter of policy treat detainees humanely. [read post]
28 Feb 2015, 7:00 am
John Bellinger showed us a more concrete battlefield in the same conflict: one of the tunnels Hamas allegedly built from Gaza into Israel. [read post]
15 Nov 2014, 6:55 am
Ben outlined why the AUMF debate even matters. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 11:30 am
” Opinions vary, but Lawfare contributor John Bellinger suggests that, “as a matter of international law, both administrations have treated the U.S. confrontation with al-Qaeda and associated groups as an “armed conflict,” and the Obama administration is very likely to do the same with ISIL. [read post]
11 Sep 2014, 12:28 pm
Second, the Obama Administration has struggled to push treaties through the Senate—as our colleague John Bellinger has chronicled here and here, arguing that the White House has failed to put the necessary muscle into both submitting treaties to the Senate in a timely fashion and in expending political capital to secure their ratification. [read post]
28 Jun 2014, 6:55 am
John Bellinger shared the recommendations of the Stimson Center Task Force on U.S. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 5:00 pm
But then Professor Glendon added (I paraphrase the conversation from memory), “I said ‘ours’ because it matters that it’s ‘ours’. [read post]
7 Jun 2014, 6:21 am
Turning to matters that don’t involve Guantanamo detainees or Bergdahl, NSA matters continue to percolate. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 1:30 pm
After all, John Bellinger is correct that “it is likely that the U.S. would be required, as a matter of international law, to release [the Taliban detainees] shortly after the end of 2014, when U.S. combat operations cease in Afghanistan. [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 9:17 pm
The ICRC in Northern Ireland Peter Maurer, Challenges to international humanitarian law: Israel's occupation policy Alan Baker, International humanitarian law, ICRC and Israel's status in the Territories Comments and OpinionsRony Brauman, Médecins Sans Frontières and the ICRC: matters of principle Paul Bouvier, Humanitarian care and small things in dehumanised places [read post]
29 Sep 2013, 2:26 pm
Given that the law has some independent weight here, the forms of legal signaling matter. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 8:34 am
John Bellinger already noted this piece in Foreign Affairs about the Kiobel case. [read post]
