Search for: "Matter of Burrell v Burrell"
Results 61 - 71
of 71
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Apr 2012, 2:50 pm
Qualitex: Aesthetic functionality is conceived of purely as a matter of competitive need, not as channeling. [read post]
23 Apr 2011, 4:49 am
(Though I think all these were reversed/dissents—V’s Secret dissent, Charbucks district court; Beebe says Nikepal required a showing of effect on distinctiveness, but it didn’t seem to matter.) [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 4:13 am
One reason, I think, is because many times the TM would be part of what doesn’t matter to most consumers, so the account of the consumer compressed only into her response to the TM is inherently contradictory: it is at least not empirical. [read post]
1 Mar 2014, 10:36 am
Expertise in the age of the internet: not as much of a gatekeeper function; gatekeeper mattered when space in which knowledge was stored was somewhat scarce (e.g., library shelves). [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 4:30 am
In Milton v. [read post]
17 Apr 2010, 3:00 am
He finds First Amendment invocations mystical; prefers the Mastercard v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 4:34 am
Dilution: does consumer perception matter? [read post]
Everything You Ever Wanted to Know About Georgia Special Purpose Grand Juries But Were Afraid to Ask
17 Oct 2022, 7:56 am
While a regular grand jury might hear evidence in hundreds of discrete cases during its brief two-month term, a special purpose grand jury typically focuses on wrongdoing related to a single event or subject matter. [read post]
24 Feb 2024, 1:10 pm
TM is a terrible subject matter for ex parte proceedings. [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 7:14 am
Inwood v. [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 9:21 am
Beebe: search costs v. information costs—what is the distinction between those? [read post]
