Search for: "Matter of C.J."
Results 61 - 80
of 526
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Mar 2021, 4:25 am
” C.J. [read post]
6 Mar 2021, 10:50 am
Ante, at 17– 25 (Tymkovich, C.J., dissenting). [read post]
22 Feb 2021, 5:00 am
Jan. 20, 2021) (Op. by Saylor, C.J.), the court addressed the current status of the law in Pennsylvania regarding res judicata and the collateral estoppel doctrine in a case involving a tax appeal. [read post]
11 Feb 2021, 2:35 pm
How "reduced" is a matter about which reasonable minds can, have, and do disagree. [read post]
10 Feb 2021, 12:48 pm
NFIB, 567 U.S. at 587 (opinion of Roberts, C.J.). [read post]
10 Feb 2021, 12:43 pm
NFIB, 567 U.S. at 587 (opinion of Roberts, C.J.). [read post]
2 Feb 2021, 6:30 am
Its “balancing test” invited judges to weigh “imponderable values,” he said, and required them “to act as legislators, not judges” in assessing the benefit side of the cost-benefit equation.[7]All that mattered under Casey’s undue burden test, the chief justice insisted, was whether a challenged law imposed a substantial obstacle on a woman’s access to an abortion before fetal viability. [read post]
6 Jan 2021, 5:01 am
And Bey makes clear that the same is true of speech on matters of private concern. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 11:36 am
” Id. at 50 (Gregory, C.J., dissenting). [read post]
29 Nov 2020, 6:20 am
Filed: April 30, 2020Opinion by: C.J. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 2:00 am
In March 2015, Gibson witnessed an interaction between plant foreman C.J. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 2:00 am
In March 2015, Gibson witnessed an interaction between plant foreman C.J. [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 5:42 am
”[8] The Supreme Court does not, as a general matter, review state court judgments resting on state law.[9] “A State’s highest court,” it has repeatedly held, “is unquestionably the ultimate expositor of state law. [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 5:42 am
”[8] The Supreme Court does not, as a general matter, review state court judgments resting on state law.[9] “A State’s highest court,” it has repeatedly held, “is unquestionably the ultimate expositor of state law. [read post]
30 Oct 2020, 12:27 pm
Would anyone defend the Bluebook as a matter of first principles? [read post]
30 Oct 2020, 5:32 am
This is a judgment that authors, editors, and readers must make as a matter of substance, in evaluating particular cases—not a question of style that should be imposed on them as a matter of course. [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 3:42 pm
Bay (Roberts, C.J., concurring) (Court "grants judicial intervention that has been withheld by lower courts" only "where the legal rights at issue are indisputably clear and, even then, sparingly and only in the most critical and exigent circumstances" (internal quotation marks omitted)).} [read post]
18 Oct 2020, 11:31 am
Ct. at 2135 (Roberts, C.J., concurring in the judgment) (quoting Casey, 505 U.S. at 878 (joint opinion)). [read post]
1 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm
Instead, all the Justices merely offered their conclusions on these matters, with five Justices expressing a view in one direction. [read post]
1 Oct 2020, 12:35 pm
Co., 751 F.3d 129 (3d Cir. 2014),to consider relative to the question of whether a federal district court should accept jurisdiction over a declaratory judgment action, the court in this matter granted the insured's motion to remand the matter to state court.Anyone wishing to review this decision may click this LINK.I send thanks to Attorney Scott Cooper of the Harrisburg, PA office of Schmidt Kramer for bringing this decision to my attention. [read post]
