Search for: "Matter of Chase v Chase"
Results 61 - 80
of 1,252
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Mar 2010, 6:09 pm
"Schaar v. [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
Petitioner acknowledged that "[p]ursuing and subduing a fleeing suspect is an ordinary employment duty of a police officer" (Matter of Quartucio v DiNapoli, 110 AD3d 1336, 1337 [2013] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]), and he agreed that such pursuits could entail "chasing [suspects] across all different types of terrain, uneven ground, jumping fences" and the like (see Matter of Sweeney v New York State Comptroller, 86… [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
Petitioner acknowledged that "[p]ursuing and subduing a fleeing suspect is an ordinary employment duty of a police officer" (Matter of Quartucio v DiNapoli, 110 AD3d 1336, 1337 [2013] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]), and he agreed that such pursuits could entail "chasing [suspects] across all different types of terrain, uneven ground, jumping fences" and the like (see Matter of Sweeney v New York State Comptroller, 86… [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
Petitioner acknowledged that "[p]ursuing and subduing a fleeing suspect is an ordinary employment duty of a police officer" (Matter of Quartucio v DiNapoli, 110 AD3d 1336, 1337 [2013] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]), and he agreed that such pursuits could entail "chasing [suspects] across all different types of terrain, uneven ground, jumping fences" and the like (see Matter of Sweeney v New York State Comptroller, 86… [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
Petitioner acknowledged that "[p]ursuing and subduing a fleeing suspect is an ordinary employment duty of a police officer" (Matter of Quartucio v DiNapoli, 110 AD3d 1336, 1337 [2013] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]), and he agreed that such pursuits could entail "chasing [suspects] across all different types of terrain, uneven ground, jumping fences" and the like (see Matter of Sweeney v New York State Comptroller, 86… [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
Petitioner acknowledged that "[p]ursuing and subduing a fleeing suspect is an ordinary employment duty of a police officer" (Matter of Quartucio v DiNapoli, 110 AD3d 1336, 1337 [2013] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]), and he agreed that such pursuits could entail "chasing [suspects] across all different types of terrain, uneven ground, jumping fences" and the like (see Matter of Sweeney v New York State Comptroller, 86… [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
Petitioner acknowledged that "[p]ursuing and subduing a fleeing suspect is an ordinary employment duty of a police officer" (Matter of Quartucio v DiNapoli, 110 AD3d 1336, 1337 [2013] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]), and he agreed that such pursuits could entail "chasing [suspects] across all different types of terrain, uneven ground, jumping fences" and the like (see Matter of Sweeney v New York State Comptroller, 86… [read post]
14 Oct 2020, 10:20 am
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 1:28 pm
Even if the Court is not bound by Griffin's case, 155 years has sufficiently settled the matter to follow Chase. [read post]
12 Nov 2009, 4:21 am
Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit, Chase No. 08-6267. [read post]
6 Feb 2009, 11:42 am
United States v. [read post]
14 Mar 2014, 8:28 am
The district court denied the employee’s motion to remand, aggregating the potential claims against Chase and finding subject matter jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 11:45 am
By Daniel RichardsonWilson v. [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 2:27 pm
" Not exactly how most police chases end.)But okay. [read post]
20 Sep 2016, 9:05 am
Facts of the Case In the recent case of Torres v. [read post]
20 Sep 2016, 9:05 am
Facts of the Case In the recent case of Torres v. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 10:03 am
" Jacobellis v. [read post]
2 Jan 2017, 9:50 am
In JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 3:55 pm
Didn't matter.) [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:36 pm
In this post, I’ll discuss the first of the CRSCC’s off-ramp arguments, which invokes Chief Justice Chase’s opinion in In re Griffin, 11 F. [read post]
