Search for: "Matter of Contempt of the Supreme Court" Results 61 - 80 of 1,601
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
If exclusive jurisdiction was not reserved in the Supreme Court for dealing with future matters involving child support or maintenance, then either the Family Court or the Supreme Court could be utilized to bring the violation or contempt application. [read post]
15 Jul 2016, 4:01 am by Timothy P. Flynn
  The Commission itself has no authority to discipline a judge; the Michigan Constitution reserves that role for the Supreme Court. [read post]
14 Oct 2007, 7:52 pm
" On appeal, Apotex argued that the contempt proceeding was beyond the district court's statutory authority because the Hatch-Waxman Act does not itself grant a district court subject matter jurisdiction to conduct such contempt proceedings. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 12:33 pm by Howard Friedman
Supreme Court today held unconstitutional under the 1st Amendment's free speech protection the provision in the Lanham Trademark Act that prohibits registration of any trademark thatconsists of ... immoral, deceptive, or scandalous matter; or matter which may disparage or falsely suggest a connection with persons, living or dead, institutions, beliefs, or national symbols, or bring them into contempt, or disrepute. (15 U. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 10:01 am by Norman L. Eisen
Supreme Court law which, in order to protect the administration of justice, allows a court to restrict a party’s extrajudicial speech that is “substantially likely to have a materially prejudicial effect” or that presents a “‘reasonable likelihood’ of a serious and imminent threat” to the integrity of the trial. [read post]
28 May 2018, 7:05 pm by Francis Pileggi
The Supreme Court ruled that: “when a Delaware court issues a status quo order pending its adjudication of questions concerning its own jurisdiction, it may punish violations of those orders with contempt and for sanctions, no matter whether it ultimately finds that it lacked jurisdiction. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 12:03 pm by Gregory Forman
On August 27, 2014 the South Carolina Supreme Court issued an administrative order superseding the May 9, 2006 order that set the 365 day benchmark to dispose of family court cases. [read post]
5 Jan 2008, 8:28 pm
Defining Hatred Fortunately, the Supreme Court of Canada has shed some light on this issue, and by so doing, have not left this question in the hands of argumentation and speculation. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 8:57 am by Dennis Crouch
by Dennis Crouch With Washington DC snowed-in, action within the Supreme Court has also been somewhat slow. [read post]
17 Oct 2021, 5:00 pm by Matrix Legal Support Service
Hearings in the Supreme Court are now shown live on the Court’s website. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 9:01 am
We conclude that the trial court properly refused to hold the plaintiff in contempt. [read post]
11 Nov 2008, 1:25 pm
Furthermore, since none of the parties was prejudiced -- nor suffered "'an injury requiring vindication'" -- the Supreme Court's contempt finding was reversed. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 12:03 pm by Gregory Forman
On August 27, 2014 the South Carolina Supreme Court issued an administrative order superseding the May 9, 2006 order that set the 365 day benchmark to dispose of family court cases. [read post]
14 Jul 2006, 9:26 am
The Georgia Supreme Court recently considered the issue of whether a debtor/ husband could be held in Contempt of Court in Superior Court for refusing to pay a joint marital debt. [read post]
28 Jan 2017, 6:30 am by Timothy P. Flynn
Judge Gorcyca has since recused herself from the case, but her contempt ruling has burgeoned into a challenge to her professional standing as a family court jurist courtesy of the Michigan Judicial Tenure Commission.Last fall, a special master made a series of findings regarding how Judge Gorcyca handled the matter; several of those findings addressed Gorcyca's decision to use her contempt powers. [read post]