Search for: "Matter of Cox"
Results 61 - 80
of 1,426
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Dec 2013, 2:58 am
In the Matter of Michael Cox, Respondent (AWC 2013036215801, December 18, 2013).D... [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 4:32 am
Call Sallah Astarita & Cox at 212-509-6544. [read post]
23 May 2014, 8:19 am
We have decades of experience in securities litigation matters, including the defense of enforcement actions and representation of investors, financial professionals and investment firms, nationwide. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 6:00 pm
This approach has been rejected by the Suprem Court in Cox & Kings. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 10:05 am
Their lives intersected from approximately December 1972 until May 1973 when Cox served as an arbitrator in the Matter of Julius Erving and the Virginia Squires Basketball Club of the American Basketball Association. [read post]
16 Apr 2011, 5:12 pm
Unfortunately, these provisions were not tested in court owing to both sides settling the matter by giving their respective undertakings. [read post]
17 Feb 2013, 9:59 pm
The applicants in the matter, Cancer Voices Australia and Yvonne D'Arcy, argued that the patents claimed unpatentable subject matter. [read post]
10 Dec 2009, 12:37 pm
The Florida Supreme Court accepted jurisdiction in Cox v. [read post]
19 Apr 2021, 1:36 pm
Call Sallah Astarita & Cox at 212-509-6544. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 9:06 am
COX V. [read post]
1 Feb 2021, 10:56 am
Call Sallah Astarita & Cox at 212-509-6544. [read post]
11 May 2020, 3:26 pm
Call Sallah Astarita & Cox at 212-509-6544. [read post]
9 Jan 2015, 10:26 am
We have decades of experience in securities litigation matters, including the defense of enforcement actions and representation of investors, financial professionals and investment firms, nationwide. [read post]
2 Feb 2021, 12:52 pm
Call Sallah Astarita & Cox at 212-509-6544. [read post]
8 Jun 2014, 9:00 am
We have decades of experience in securities litigation matters, including the defense of enforcement actions and insider trading trials. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 9:20 pm
Mandamus is an extraordinary remedy; it is not issued as a matter of right but rather at the discretion of the court. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 9:20 pm
Mandamus is an extraordinary remedy; it is not issued as a matter of right but rather at the discretion of the court. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 8:04 pm
But since they will be part of the new Communication Cartel, that won’t really matter. [read post]
2 Nov 2007, 10:00 am
Getting a no access proposal in place before the advent of the 2008 proxy season was going to be tough no matter what. [read post]
18 Jan 2014, 12:21 pm
The panel also: Ruled that Cox's crime-charging post dealt with "a matter of public concern". [read post]
