Search for: "Matter of David B." Results 61 - 80 of 3,095
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Feb 2024, 10:23 am by Rebecca Tushnet
In Cariou, the ordered destruction of the Prince works clearly mattered to the Second Circuit’s reversal. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 3:49 am by SHG
No matter, because either way, there is nothing here that would constitute an impeachable offense. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 5:21 am by David Post
There is another injury, of course, and it is the one that really matters, for the two of us, given our particular circumstances. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 7:07 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
One example of an agency using Brand X to the benefit of an immigrant may be found in Matter of Douglas , 26 I&N Dec. 197 (BIA 2013), discussed at length by David Isaacson in a prior blog . [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm by renholding
I dissent from the Commission’s denial of a petition to amend Rule 202.5(e), our so-called gag rule.[1]  This de facto rule follows from the Commission’s enforcement of its policy, adopted in 1972, that it will not “permit a defendant or respondent to consent to a judgment or order that imposes a sanction while denying the allegations in the complaint or order for proceedings. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 2:06 am by David Pocklington
Cite this article as: David Pocklington, "Forms of Objection in Faculty Proceedings" in Law & Religion UK, 30 January 2024, https://lawandreligionuk.com/2024/01/30/forms-of-objection-in-faculty-proceedings/ [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 12:37 pm by Guest Author
” But as an empirical matter, this is an overly short-term view of the social media marketplace. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 10:49 am by Edward T. Kang
In the January 23, 2024 edition of The Legal Intelligencer, Edward Kang wrote, “Collective David Against Corporate Goliaths: Named Plaintiffs’ Standing in Antitrust Class Actions. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 3:58 am by SHG
But David did, and this is what he thought he was supporting. [read post]
21 Jan 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
This post comes to us from Professor David Rosenfeld at Northern Illinois University College of Law. [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 2:07 am by David Pocklington
If I am wrong, my view is that the resulting public benefit from approving ‘Option B’ (including matters such as liturgical freedom, pastoral well-being, opportunities for mission and putting the church to viable uses that are consistent with its role as a place of worship and mission) outweighs the harm that will be caused. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 11:11 pm by Josh Blackman
Structural considerations further support the President's unique constitutional status Filed on 1/15/24 Amicus brief of David E. [read post]