Search for: "Matter of Dept. of Insurance's Order"
Results 61 - 80
of 430
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jan 2013, 8:02 am
Co., 612 N.Y.S.2d 43 (1st Dept.1994).2Seaboard Sur. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 2:54 am
There are ancillary matters (QDRO) that follow, and more than three years later, client is sued over the late husband's life insurance policy. [read post]
19 Oct 2008, 12:01 pm
Corp.(3rd Dept., decided 10/16/2008)New York's no-prejudice rule is on DNR. [read post]
5 Sep 2008, 8:50 am
Rienzo(2nd Dept., decided 9/2/2008)In Matter of State Farm Ins. [read post]
27 Aug 2015, 11:56 am
However, at the hearing, respondent, citing Matter of Ruiz v MVAIC (19 AD2d 832 [2d Dept 1963]) and Byrd v Johnson (60 AD2d 900 [2d Dept 1978]) and their progeny, argued further that, even if the court is satisfied that petitioner has otherwise complied with subdivision (b) of section 5218 of the Insurance Law, petitioner, in order to satisfy the "reasonable efforts" requirement of subdivision (b) (5), must first exhaust his remedy and conclude… [read post]
26 Apr 2009, 8:51 pm
Jones(4th Dept., decided 4/24/2009)GMAC commenced this special proceeding to stay arbitration of Jones' UM claim. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 7:08 am
In this matter, the claimant commenced this special proceeding pursuant to Insurance Law § 5218(c) for leave to commence an action against MVAIC, which opposed the petition based on its assertion that the claimant had failed to report the hit-and-run accident to the police within 24 hours. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 6:00 am
Accordingly, Plaintiffs' may go forward with their efforts seeking a court order compelling the Town to reimburse certain health insurance premiums which Plaintiffs contend they are entitled to pursuant to the terms of a CBA between Town and the Union that represented Plaintiffs during their employment by the Town. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 6:00 am
Accordingly, Plaintiffs' may go forward with their efforts seeking a court order compelling the Town to reimburse certain health insurance premiums which Plaintiffs contend they are entitled to pursuant to the terms of a CBA between Town and the Union that represented Plaintiffs during their employment by the Town. [read post]
15 Mar 2007, 3:18 am
Salmon.In an appeal from a decision below that an unemployment insurance claimant had "good cause" under Section 8-1005(a)(2) of the Employment Article to reject a full-time, suitable but seasonal (lasting only twelve weeks) offer of employment, the Court of Appeals REVERSED and REMANDED to the Board of Appeals for entry of an order consistent with the opinion.The appellant ("STS") had employed a full-time receptionist ("Long") during the 2004 tax… [read post]
10 Dec 2008, 6:34 am
Rechev of Brooklyn, Inc. (1st Dept., decided 12/9/2008) We're only 38 days away from the January 17, 2009 effective date of the Direct DJ/Late Notice bill and its new requirement that liability insurers show prejudice in order to disclaim for late notice of an accident or occurrence. [read post]
8 Jan 2021, 11:52 am
Div. 3d Dept. [read post]
24 Aug 2009, 9:24 am
Co., 287 AD2d 389 [1st Dept 2001]; see also Wraight v Exchange Ins. [read post]
14 Apr 2009, 7:39 am
The Court of Appeals in California denied review of the order in 2007. [read post]
20 Dec 2009, 6:06 pm
On plaintiff's insurance claim, the parties disputed the amount due under plaintiff's policy. [read post]
6 Jul 2020, 8:11 pm
Co. (74 AD 3d 28 [4th Dept. 2010])("the 'death toll' in CPLR 210(a) is applicable to an action against an insurer where the policy at issue contains the two-year limitations period contained in Insurance Law § 3404 (e)"). [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 2:30 pm
Thus, the court erred when it did not order the husband to maintain health insurance for her. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 8:05 am
In Matter of Malek v Kwiatkowski, --- N.Y.S.2d ----, 2011 WL 5984260 (N.Y.A.D. 3 Dept.) [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 7:50 am
Co. v Posa, 56 AD3d 1143 (4th Dept. 2008), holding that the insured's Posa's "failure to make fair and truthful disclosures in reporting the [accident] constitute[d] a breach of the cooperation clause [and the fraud and misrepresentation clause] of the insurance policy as a matter of law[.] [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 6:28 am
Co. (4th Dept., decided 7/10/2009) The motion court's rulings against the CGL insurer went 0-3 on this appeal. [read post]
