Search for: "Matter of Doe v Kelly"
Results 61 - 80
of 638
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Oct 2022, 5:26 am
Trump v. [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 9:11 am
Citing the Supreme Court’s decision in Patton v. [read post]
29 Sep 2022, 6:29 am
’ (Kelly confirmed the account). [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 12:20 pm
The speakers were Kelly Bennett and Thom Clark from the Legal Department. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 6:00 am
Complaint ¶ 1, Alianza Americas v. [read post]
16 Sep 2022, 4:34 pm
GermanyDer Dritte Weg v. [read post]
9 Sep 2022, 10:52 am
Kelly v. [read post]
23 Aug 2022, 5:01 am
Proud Boy Dominic Pezzola and Oath Keepers Kelly Meggs, Roberto Minuta, and Jessica Watkins were also singled out during the hearings. [read post]
21 Aug 2022, 9:01 pm
If Congress passes strong federal privacy legislation—as I hope it does—or if there is any other significant change in applicable law, then the Commission would be able to reassess the value-add of this effort and whether continuing it is a sound use of resources. [read post]
21 Aug 2022, 5:06 am
In National Assn of Broadcasters v. [read post]
14 Aug 2022, 1:26 am
Quick links June Kelly, BBC News: EU Settlement Scheme: Bogus marriage couples not being prosecuted. [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 10:24 am
The ANPRM does not contain any proposed regulatory language. [read post]
5 Aug 2022, 4:45 am
Wanda Vázquez Garced was arrested yesterday on bribery charges, the Justice Department has said. [read post]
26 Jul 2022, 2:36 pm
From Hockenberry v. [read post]
8 Jul 2022, 5:01 am
” Kelly made three arguments in dissent. [read post]
8 Jul 2022, 4:00 am
The majority in Dobbs v. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 9:39 am
Dist. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:05 pm
Petitioner failed to show by competent proof that ACS terminated his employment in bad faith, or for an improper or impermissible reason (see Matter of Che Lin Tsao v Kelly, 28 AD3d 320, 321 [1st Dept 2006]; see also Matter of Patterson v City of New York, 173 AD3d 540, 541 [1st Dept 2019], lv denied 35 NY3d 906 [2020]). [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:05 pm
Petitioner failed to show by competent proof that ACS terminated his employment in bad faith, or for an improper or impermissible reason (see Matter of Che Lin Tsao v Kelly, 28 AD3d 320, 321 [1st Dept 2006]; see also Matter of Patterson v City of New York, 173 AD3d 540, 541 [1st Dept 2019], lv denied 35 NY3d 906 [2020]). [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:02 pm
Kelly, Hyde Park, appellant pro se. [read post]