Search for: "Matter of Eisner"
Results 61 - 74
of 74
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Apr 2008, 12:19 am
***Entirely separately -->One IPBiz reader furnished a link to ‘Originality, Imitation and Plagiarism' edited by Caroline Eisner, academic dean at Landmark College, and Martha Vicinus, director of the Sweetland Writing Center and the Eliza M. [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 1:34 pm
A criminal defense blog dealing with federal matters, this project deals with litigation within and outside of the Peach State. [read post]
15 Mar 2008, 1:21 pm
See there for a list of those amendments.The Patry Copyright Blog posts on Michael Eisner and the History of Copyright. [read post]
8 Feb 2008, 4:07 pm
A redesigned version of Burke & Eisner's Cerebral Palsy Law Blog. [read post]
8 Feb 2008, 10:00 am
Michael Eisner, because of his close relationship to Michael Ovitz, had an interest in the contract. [read post]
15 Nov 2007, 4:18 pm
They said we had to do it in four days or else Eisner would decide he paid too much and start renegotiating. [read post]
30 Oct 2007, 11:39 am
Eisner (2000), which the court itself described as "a close case" which "pushes the envelope of judicial respect for the business judgment of directors .... [read post]
8 Jul 2007, 7:19 pm
The book also delves into the Disney/Eisner-Katzenberg dispute that James B. [read post]
2 May 2007, 8:12 pm
Stewart for that matter. [read post]
13 Apr 2007, 10:01 pm
Eisner, the court held that the business judgment rule does not apply when the board has "act[ed] in a manner that cannot be attributed to a rational business purpose. [read post]
15 Mar 2007, 5:30 am
To guess what might have been uncovered had discovery proceeded would have been a matter of speculation, not a particularly useful exercise. [read post]
14 Mar 2007, 5:15 am
The Court of Chancery held that "no reasonable doubt can exist as to Eisner's disinterest in the approval of the Employment Agreement, as a matter of law," and similarly that plaintiffs "have not demonstrated a reasonable doubt that Eisner was disinterested in granting Ovitz a Non-Fault Termination. [read post]
30 Jan 2007, 1:32 pm
Manne maintains that shareholder activists are deluding themselves with the phrase “corporate democracy” in that only the controlling s/h have and will ever have a true voice in corporate matters (such that there never will be any “corporate democracy” as a practical matter). [read post]
3 Jan 2007, 3:59 pm
Ch. 1987) (holding that "a conscious decision as to the types of information provided to the directors would fall within the protection of the business judgment rule as a general matter"). [read post]
