Search for: "Matter of Gomez v Gomez" Results 61 - 80 of 243
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jul 2020, 10:27 am by Eugene Volokh
From the Report-Recommendation by Magistrate Judge Therèse Wiley Dancks (N.D.N.Y.) in Gomez v. [read post]
13 Jul 2007, 3:04 pm
See Garcia, 2005 NMSC 17, P 29; Gomez, 1997 NMSC 6, PP 35, 39; Jones, 2002 NMCA 19, PP 12, 15; see also State v. [read post]
1 Jun 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Citing Matter of Gomez v Hernandez, 50 AD3d 404, the Appellate Division opined "Even [well-qualified] candidates such as [Plaintiff] ... can be denied [appointment] provided appropriate discretion is used within the confines of the 'one-of-three' rule in Civil Service Law §61.* The court observed, "it is not arbitrary and capricious for an agency to provide no reason for an appointing official's exercise of discretion in declining to appoint… [read post]
1 Jun 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Citing Matter of Gomez v Hernandez, 50 AD3d 404, the Appellate Division opined "Even [well-qualified] candidates such as [Plaintiff] ... can be denied [appointment] provided appropriate discretion is used within the confines of the 'one-of-three' rule in Civil Service Law §61.* The court observed, "it is not arbitrary and capricious for an agency to provide no reason for an appointing official's exercise of discretion in declining to appoint… [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 4:15 am by SHG
Kelly informed [them] that he lived there, but that didn’t matter. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 5:45 am by Joel R. Brandes
  In Berezowsky v Rendon Ojeda, 2016 WL 3254054 (5th Cir.2016) Michelle Gomez Berezowsky filed a Hague Convention petition arguing that Rendon wrongfully removed PARB from his habitual residence (purportedly Mexico). [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 9:07 am by Michael Cannan
To complicate matters, insurance policies never define what either requires or means. [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 10:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" Citing Matter of McComb v Reasoner, 29 AD3d 795, the Appellate Division noted that the Court of Appeals has interpreted Civil Service Law §72(2)  to "require[ ] that the power to discipline be delegated, if necessary, within the governmental department's chain of command" and that the Court of Appeals has further interpreted Civil Service Law §72(2) to:1. require that the power to discipline be delegated, if necessary, within the governmental… [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 10:53 am by John Floyd
  Judge “Must Be” Disqualified if Actively Participated in the Case   As for the Eleventh District’s distinction between perfunctory acts and active participation in disqualification matters, the appeals court was aware, or should have been, that the Court of Criminal Appeals had only once found “perfunctory acts” and that was in the case of Gomez v. [read post]
11 Sep 2020, 9:16 am by Kathleen
The officer’s opinion is important, but it is not necessarily the last word on the matter. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 12:32 pm by Ad Law Defense
  Campbell-Ewald Co. v. [read post]
26 Jan 2018, 5:06 pm by Richard Hunt
Northwest Federal Credit Union is similar in some ways to the decision in Gomez v. [read post]
21 Feb 2009, 4:57 am
., the Supreme Court will hear Rivera v. [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 4:59 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
., Inc. v Siegel & Reiner, LLP 2024 NY Slip Op 50292(U) Decided on March 20, 2024 Supreme Court, Bronx County Gomez, J. is the kind of legal malpractice case that comes up often enough to support the idea that real estate in NYC is a paramount, driving economic force, and that the extensive lawyering necessary results in many legal malpractice cases. [read post]