Search for: "Matter of Gross v Gross"
Results 61 - 80
of 2,336
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Feb 2009, 8:32 pm
Whether the Ninth Circuit's construction of "willfully" under section 1681n of FCRA impermissibly permits a finding of willfulness to be based upon nothing more than negligence, gross negligence, or a completely good-faith but incorrect interpretation of the law, and upon conduct that is objectively reasonable as a matter of law, rather than requiring proof of a defendant's knowledge that its conduct violated FCRA or, at a minimum, recklessness in its subjective… [read post]
22 Nov 2015, 6:03 am
Green v. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 10:36 am
Summary of Decision June 27, 2012Order affirming the judgment and sentence of the District CourtCase Name: Dennis Jay Gross v. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 3:45 pm
Waterman’s brain injury appeal, Burns v. [read post]
13 Feb 2020, 4:00 am
Although Petitioner argued that the confrontation between himself and the other member of the Department constituted "harmless horseplay," it is undisputed that Petitioner causing an injury to that member, in violation of Department policy.Noting the "judicial review of an administrative penalty" is limited to whether the measure or mode of penalty or discipline imposed constitutes an abuse of discretion as a matter of law" the Appellate Division,… [read post]
15 Jan 2009, 10:21 am
Schwartz v. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 5:01 am
The Supreme Court, in Comr. v. [read post]
2 Jan 2015, 1:29 pm
Broadspring, Inc. v. [read post]
New Ruling Allows for Secret Recording of Public Officials Engaged in Public Duties in Public Places
31 Jan 2019, 1:07 pm
Gross and Project Veritas Action Fund v. [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 6:41 am
The adoption of the CAT, therefore, was—and remains—a matter of significant controversy, as well as the subject of considerable interest for policymakers and tax economists. [read post]
13 Dec 2017, 3:00 am
Scott v. [read post]
17 May 2014, 3:25 pm
A court is not required to wait for the natural guardians to appear before appointing a guardian ad litem if to do so would constitute a danger to the infant's interests as held in Trippe v Trippe, Matter of Thomas and Matter of Beyer. [read post]
2 Oct 2011, 10:48 am
Tort Talkers may recall that I recently summarized an Opinion by Judge Nealon on this issue in the context of automobile accident matters in the case of Freethy v. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 10:23 am
(Joyce v Ford Motor Company). [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 11:55 am
In Ramphal v Department for Transport (EAT – 2015), the EAT has provided guidance on the appropriate level of HR involvement in disciplinary proceedings. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 3:01 am
In other words, as the contract of sale had already been signed and altered before the real estate closing, contrary to the Schiff defendants' contention, they did not establish as a matter of law that Gross had "a sufficient opportunity to protect the plaintiffs' rights" (Katz v Herzfeld & Rubin, P.C., 48 AD3d 640, 641), such that Schiff's conduct could not have proximately caused the plaintiff's damages. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 12:00 am
IN THE MATTER OF STATE v. [read post]
24 Nov 2011, 9:25 am
Working Men’s Club & Institute Union Ltd v Balls. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 11:03 am
The recent New Mexico Court of Appeals case of May v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 10:54 am
It's true that waivers of liability can complicate matters, and it's also a fact that many Florida courts have upheld these waivers as valid. [read post]
