Search for: "Matter of Held"
Results 61 - 80
of 72,915
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jun 2009, 10:10 am
The Florida Supreme Court has held that the Family Law Section of the Florida Bar may file an amicus brief on a matter of interest to the section. [read post]
15 May 2010, 8:21 am
An appellate court held that a zoning board's failure to comply with the "precise requirements" of the open meetings law did not rise to a level which required that the matter be remanded for further action in public. [read post]
26 Dec 2017, 3:50 am
Courts support broad investigation into financial matters especially when there is a business asset at stake in a divorce. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 7:39 am
Chief Judge Brian Jackson of the US District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana [official website], held Thursday that a police officer could not sue Black Lives Matter (BLM) for injuries sustained during a protest on July 9, 2016 because BLM is not an entity. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 6:18 am
Louisiana Matter in North Carolina? [read post]
27 Mar 2008, 8:57 pm
"Protecting Americans' habeas rights: No matter what the administration says, two U.S. citizens held by the military in Iraq deserve a hearing. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 10:25 pm
The event was held on the 36th anniversary of the Supreme Court's decision in Roe v. [read post]
11 Dec 2019, 2:10 am
"Not A Matter of If, But 'When': Expanding the Immigration Caging Machine Regardless of Nielsen" by Felipe De Jesus Hernandez, Harvard Latinx Law Review, Vol. 22, No. 5, pp. 87-145, 2019 Abstract Annually, over 400,000 people are held in 3x3m... [read post]
21 Jan 2018, 3:08 am
An international seminar on new procedural legislation in civil and family matters will be held from 13 to 15 February 2018 in Toluca, Mexico. [read post]
14 Feb 2023, 1:23 pm
No matter how much disdain is held for the other parent, if they are not a danger to the health, safety, or general welfare of the child they should not be kept away from their children. [read post]
16 Apr 2023, 4:00 am
Can a school be held liable for a visitor’s injuries on its campus? [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 4:56 am
Supreme Court held that business methods are not per se unpatentable, the USPTO has published a set of Interim Guidance for Determining Subject Matter Eligibility of Process Claims for patent applications in the post-Bilski world. [read post]
27 Aug 2021, 7:00 am
No matter their age, every driver has a duty of care to uphold to all other motorists and pedestrians. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 9:07 am
The Second Circuit has held that it did not have appellate jurisdiction to hear an appeal from an order remanding a case to state court after the District Court had joined a party whose presence destroyed subject-matter jurisdiction. [read post]
15 Sep 2015, 5:40 am
The Connecticut Supreme Court held that a state agency's mental health records may not be disclosed in a matter involving treatment records of a notorious serial killer The present case arises from the ruling of the named defendant, the Freedom... [read post]
29 Aug 2017, 12:19 pm
It held that a child in a custody matter does not have “full-party status” (Matter of McDermott v. [read post]
21 Mar 2019, 9:45 am
Creative Compounds, LLC, the Federal Circuit vacated the decision of the district court in the Southern District of California, which held that several sets of claims issued to Natural Alternatives International (“Natural”) were not directed to patentable subject matter under 35 USC § 101. [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 9:05 pm
A Capital News Service series published at Maryland Matters confirms that in Maryland, at least, bail reform has had trouble meeting its intended goals. [read post]
18 May 2012, 5:41 am
The Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (”Federal Circuit”) has held that a computer aided method of managing a credit application, by receiving data, sending credit data and forwarding funding decision (with certain alternative steps of selectively sending portions data) is not patent eligible subject matter under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 9:29 am
Based on this finding, the court held as a matter of law that children under five can never be liable for negligence. [read post]
