Search for: "Matter of Holmes v Brown"
Results 61 - 80
of 89
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Apr 2019, 6:00 am
Or they may consciously adopt the role of “public intellectuals,” where the key datum is the receptivity of reporters or the editors of op-ed pages to solicit their views about pressing matters of the day. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 8:24 pm
Jason Jordan, University of North Texas: De Jure Blackness: Racialization in Brown v. [read post]
23 Dec 2008, 2:57 pm
However, the matter is remanded for clarification of findings at sentencing with regards to whether defendants possessed the firearms in connection with possession of cocaine. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 5:11 pm
“ In Brown v. [read post]
21 Dec 2007, 11:59 am
Should appeal to Gordon Brown with his “British jobs for British workers” spiel. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 9:00 am
” Wrighten v. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 9:01 pm
As Oliver Wendell Holmes put it, “three generations of imbeciles are enough. [read post]
24 Jun 2020, 7:01 pm
For example, in 1958, Judge Learned Hand of the Second Circuit delivered the Holmes Lectures at Harvard Law School and sharply criticized recent Supreme Court decisions on constitutional law, including Brown v. [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 10:36 pm
Be very careful to make sure a Hawaii doctor knows an interview is voluntary, do not get into irrelevant matters, etc. [read post]
10 Oct 2007, 10:59 pm
Rees, et al., 217 S.W.3d 307 (Ky. 2006).........7 Brown v. [read post]
3 Feb 2022, 7:58 pm
Fifty-eight years later, in Brown v. [read post]
26 Jun 2020, 6:30 am
” Hence Oliver Wendell Holmes’s famous statement that “it is the merit of the common law that it decides the case first and determines the principle afterwards. [read post]
2 Feb 2007, 6:52 am
An Epitome of Great Legal Classics
1 v. (1915) Hughes, William Taylor
Office of Constable: Comprising the Laws Relating to High, Petty, and Special Constables, Headboroughs, Tithingmen, Borsholders, and Watchmen, with an Account of Their Institution and Appointment
1 v. (1840) Willcock, John William
On Conveyancers' Evidence
1 v. (1839) Coventry, Thomas
On the Admissibility of Confessions and… [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 12:05 pm
Antonin Scalia, A Matter of Interpretation (Amy Gutmann ed., 2018). [read post]
2 Apr 2018, 12:01 pm
” Or, after Lee v. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 6:00 am
In Brown v. [read post]
24 May 2017, 2:50 am
For this reason, the board has included this matter in the order.2. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 9:19 am
” And even as far back as Gibbons v. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 9:30 pm
[We grateful to Victoria Saker Woeste of the American Bar Foundation (vswoeste@abfn.org) for this full report of an excellent conference. [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 6:30 am
The debate in many ways goes back to Justice Holmes’s typically cryptic dissenting opinion in Lochner v. [read post]
