Search for: "Matter of Johnson v Kelly"
Results 61 - 79
of 79
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jan 2010, 1:26 pm
Hall, No. 09–5731 In a capital habeas matter, the petition for certiorari is granted and the court of appeals' order is vacated and remanded where the court of appeals incorrectly held that the habeas petition, which claimed that petitioner was denied discovery into the issue of whether there had been improper communications between the judge and jury, was procedurally barred based on an insufficient record, contrary to Cone v. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 1:26 pm
Hall, No. 09–5731 In a capital habeas matter, the petition for certiorari is granted and the court of appeals' order is vacated and remanded where the court of appeals incorrectly held that the habeas petition, which claimed that petitioner was denied discovery into the issue of whether there had been improper communications between the judge and jury, was procedurally barred based on an insufficient record, contrary to Cone v. [read post]
15 Jan 2010, 10:11 am
Practically speaking, however, the source code coalition has prepared matters to point where it requires little effort from attorneys to take advantage of this issue. [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 1:49 pm
That ruling, U.S. v. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 6:59 am
" Sentencing Law and Policy offers a recap of another of yesterday's arguments, Johnson v. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 10:44 am
(Dorchester, MA; Kelly Flannery, President) Abtech Corp. [read post]
4 Jun 2009, 11:31 pm
It's just a matter of time. 2. [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 7:00 am
: Kelly and another v GE Healthcare Ltd (IP finance) (Mis)appropriation of Wii and PlayStation brands to name medical disorders (IPKat) Is regulation of trade mark attorneys necessary? [read post]
29 May 2008, 10:14 am
Johnson v. [read post]
27 May 2008, 3:47 pm
Roberts referred the matter to the full Court. [read post]
22 May 2008, 12:41 am
Although the Appellate Division noted that Garnes "was terminable without a hearing and without a statement of the reason for his dismissal," the court, citing York v McGuire, 63 NY2d 760 and Matter of Johnson v Kelly, 35 AD3d 297, said the Garnes failed to demonstrate that his termination was in bad faith, unlawful, or for an impermissible reason. [read post]
21 May 2008, 1:43 am
Although the Appellate Division noted that Garnes "was terminable without a hearing and without a statement of the reason for his dismissal," the court, citing York v McGuire, 63 NY2d 760 and Matter of Johnson v Kelly, 33 AD3d 297, said that Garnes failed to demonstrate that his termination was made in bad faith, was unlawful, or was for an impermissible reason. [read post]
20 May 2008, 10:27 am
Reversed.NFP criminal opinions today (11): Theodore Johnson v. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 4:50 am
Attorneys for Amicus Curiae Defense Trial Counsel of Indiana; James Johnson of Evansville, IN and Christine Stach of Fort Wayne, IN. 9:45:AM - In the Matter of J.C.C. v. [read post]
31 Oct 2007, 7:45 am
J. 12 *** Kelly E. [read post]
9 Oct 2007, 10:49 pm
United States, 405 U.S. 150 (1972) .................. 4 Johnson v. [read post]
10 May 2007, 10:39 am
State of Indiana (NFP) Anthony Johnson v. [read post]
24 Mar 2007, 8:47 am
Appeal from Johnson district court; PETER V. [read post]
23 Dec 2006, 10:50 am
ESTAuburn Tigers (10) v. [read post]
