Search for: "Matter of Jonathan R. v Michael R." Results 61 - 80 of 173
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Dec 2017, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Courts have often expressed—as the Supreme Court did in United States v. [read post]
24 Aug 2017, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
”Raven should be considered alongside the 2009 ruling (almost two decades later) in Strauss v. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 9:07 am by Ilya Somin
Jonathan Adler, David Bernstein (see also here), Phil Magness (also here), Russell Roberts, and Michael Munger, and others, have highlighted some of her most important fallacies and distortions. [read post]
16 May 2017, 3:45 am by Edith Roberts
” Briefly: At the Pacific Legal Foundation’s Liberty Blog, Jonathan Wood maintains that Rinehart v. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar and Michael Schaps
Moreover, the fact that Printz involved gun control (at a time when many of the members of its majority were beginning to think that the Second Amendment ought to be read more forcefully) complicates matters; it is possible that some people who believe Printz was correctly decided might create an exception for immigration or national security matters. [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 8:20 am by Ilya Somin
Jonathan Adler notes some additional flaws in the deference theory here. [read post]
28 Oct 2016, 1:18 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
Supreme Court agreed to hear Gloucester County School Board v. [read post]
22 Sep 2016, 1:33 pm by Josh Blackman
Boehner (R-Ohio ) in Washington on Oct. 27, 2015. ( Andrew Harrer/Bloomberg) In House of Representatives v. [read post]
29 Aug 2016, 1:00 pm by Steve Lubet
Davis, PhD Professor of Biochemistry and Genetics Stanford University Stanford, California Jonathan C.W. [read post]
3 May 2016, 2:41 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
 Michael Michaud, Channel Awesome, Inc.: My company makes content on YT and has a website that attracts millions. [read post]
17 Apr 2016, 9:28 pm by Kim Kirschenbaum
Graham and Paul R. [read post]