Search for: "Matter of Kagan"
Results 61 - 80
of 2,749
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jun 2010, 7:41 pm
Finally, Wilner asserted that a nominee’s answers matter little in the end, as increasingly partisan voting in the Senate has trumped any significance that a nominee’s answers might carry. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 6:52 am
So here is Elena Kagan’s Top 10 List of private cases. [read post]
9 May 2010, 11:36 pm
If Democrats believe they can’t avoid a tough nomination battle no matter what they do, they will have little reason to go with relative moderates. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 12:12 pm
After sitting on the sidelines for much of the Elena Kagan confirmation process, the National Rifle Association has entered the fray: it's officially opposing her nomination to the Supreme Court. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 7:05 pm
That said, I believe that as a matter of both principle and law, Kagan should not hear the case. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 7:56 pm
[Kagan: "Kavanaugh, J. [read post]
13 May 2010, 2:40 pm
” But does it matter? [read post]
5 Jun 2010, 6:15 am
Kagan was adamant. [read post]
13 May 2010, 8:24 am
It doesn't matter what I felt. [read post]
31 May 2021, 9:01 pm
Again, Justice Kagan dissented, and again invoking stare decisis as a basis, observing that because “[n]ow . . . [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 10:15 am
I suppose that we may learn more facts about Kagan's participation vel non in the matter, but I'm not seeing it yet. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 8:51 am
So it is ironic that the only set of facts that might warrant a recusal in the matter relates to Justice Kagan and is being unlawfully withheld by the Obama administration that appointed her. [read post]
10 May 2010, 10:28 am
It is hard to know Kagan's views on immigration matters. [read post]
12 May 2010, 11:49 am
How much does this matter for Kagan’s nomination? [read post]
10 May 2010, 12:47 pm
Still, here’s my rough sense of the matter: a. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 3:22 pm
Enter, Justice Kagan. [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 7:14 am
Among other things, the story reports that some groups are put off by documents released from Kagan’s time in the Clinton Administration that reveal her disagreements with Christopher Edley on racial matters, such as whether Clinton’s race initiative should have included a ban on racial profiling. [read post]
13 May 2010, 6:22 am
" The Los Angeles Times reports that "Supreme Court nominee Kagan's experience questioned; She's never been a judge and has little trial experience; Republicans and Democrats debate whether that should matter. [read post]
29 Sep 2018, 5:51 am
That's not the Kagan idea. [read post]
11 May 2010, 1:20 pm
If Democrats believe they can’t avoid a tough nomination battle no matter what they do, they will have little reason to go with relative moderates. [read post]
