Search for: "Matter of Kerr v Kerr"
Results 61 - 80
of 878
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Apr 2011, 4:36 pm
The case of Parkwood Leisure Limited v Alemo-Herron and others will be heard from Wednesday 13 to Thursday 14 April 2011, also by Lords Hope, Walker, Brown, Kerr and Dyson. [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 9:07 am
By Jonathan Hunter: In a highly anticipated decision, the Tenth Circuit held this week that the district court had subject matter jurisdiction over a qui tam action filed by an MMS auditor concerning royalty payments on crude oil produced from offshore federal leases. [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 9:05 am
On Monday and Tuesday, the 3 and 4 December 2018, the Supreme Court (Lady Hale, Lord Reed, Lord Kerr, Lord Wilson, Lord Sumption, Lord Carnwath, and Lord Lloyd-Jones) will hear Privacy International’s appeal (UKSC 2018/0004) against the Court of Appeal’s decision in R (Privacy International) v Investigatory Powers Tribunal ([2017] EWCA Civ 1868; [2018] 1 WLR 2572), which found that the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 (“RIPA 2000”), s 67(8)… [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 11:02 am
(Orin Kerr) Legal debates over the constitutionality of the individtal mandate generally focus on three different questions: (1) As a matter of constitutional theory, how should a court rule based on a normative theory of interpretation; (2) As a matter of existing doctrine, how does the mandate fit (or not fit) into existing law, and (3) As a prediction, if the case reaches the Supreme Court, how might the Justices rule? [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 3:13 pm
(Orin Kerr) There’s an important e-mail privacy dispute brewing in Colorado: DOJ and Yahoo are clashing in court on the ground that the Ninth Circuit covered in its very weird opinion in Theofel v. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 2:15 am
In the matter of Peacock, heard 14 December 2011. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 12:24 am
They do not address the same subject matter. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 10:02 am
(Orin Kerr) The case is United States v. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 5:29 am
Case details are unavailable for this matter. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 5:14 am
U.S. and Printz v. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 12:08 am
Today, 24 January 2019, five Supreme Court judges (Lord Reed, Lord Kerr, Lady Black, Lord Briggs and Lord Kitchin) will hear Stocker v Stocker UKSC 2018/0045, an appeal against the 12 February 2018 Court of Appeal decision of Lady Justice Sharp, with whom Lord Justice McFarlane and Sir John Laws concurred ([2018] EWCA Civ 170). [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 11:52 am
(Orin Kerr) Today’s news that Paul Clement is leaving King & Spaulding over his defense of DOMA reminds me of one of the big stories among Harvard Law students when I was a student there back in the mid-1990s: The boycott of Sidley & Austin for its representation of the state of Colorado in Romer v. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 10:14 pm
Just as a matter of precedent, that doesn’t seem to me consistent with Wickard v. [read post]
20 Mar 2011, 5:31 am
On Monday 21 and Tuesday 22 March, Lords Hope, Rodger, Brown, Kerr and Dyson will hear the devoluation appeal of Fraser v Her Majesty’s Advocate. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 1:13 pm
Randy’s argument is more or less the one Justice Scalia makes in his concurring opinion in Gonzales v. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 11:05 am
(Orin Kerr) Reading the blog and media reaction to Judge Reinhardt’s opinion for the Ninth Circuit in Perry v. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 11:05 am
(Orin Kerr) Reading the blog and media reaction to Judge Reinhardt’s opinion for the Ninth Circuit in Perry v. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 8:09 am
Having been consulted, the part that he played and the influence which he exerted were matters for his political judgment. [read post]
10 Jul 2011, 2:02 pm
The Supreme Court will hear two appeals this week commencing with the two day hearing of R v Gnango on Monday 11 and Tuesday 12 July 2011 to be heard by Lords Phillips, Brown, Judge, Kerr, Clarke, Dyson and Wilson. [read post]
13 Feb 2020, 6:46 am
RIVERHEAD, NY The question of whether the attorneys departed from good practice, allowing Plaintiff to be jailed for contempt in not paying child and spousal support was determined in the summary judgment decision in Rivera v Kerr 2019 NY Slip Op 33047(U) October 11, 2019 Supreme Court, Suffolk County Docket Number: 17736/2015 Judge: Sanford Neil Berland. [read post]
