Search for: "Matter of Kerr v Kerr" Results 61 - 80 of 878
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Nov 2020, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The proposed panel for hand down is Lord Kerr, Lord Lloyd-Jones, Lord Kitchin, Lord Hamblen, and Lord Burrows. [read post]
22 Oct 2020, 4:43 pm by INFORRM
Their reaction to the post is impressionistic and fleeting’ (Lord Kerr, para. 44; see also Monir v Wood [2018] EWHC 3525, [90]  Nicklin J). [read post]
19 Oct 2020, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The proposed panel for hand down is Lord Kerr, Lord Wilson, Lady Black, Lord Briggs, and Lady Arden. [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
 The proposed panel for hand down is Lord Reed, Lord Kerr, Lady Arden, Lord Kitchin, and Lord Sales. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 1:45 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The majority judgment was given by Lord Hamblen and Lord Leggatt with whom Lord Kerr agreed. [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 7:32 am by Ronald Collins
” What courts decide really matters, so who decides also matters. [read post]
8 Sep 2020, 4:54 pm by Orin S. Kerr
The search occurred there, and what matters is that notice was provided where the search occurred. [read post]
18 Aug 2020, 5:13 am by Blinne Ní Ghrálaigh
Introduction On 13 May 2020, the Supreme Court handed down judgment in the case of R v Adams (Appellant) (Northern Ireland) [2020] UKSC 19. [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 8:36 am by Marty Lederman
  [UPDATE:  Orin Kerr is right that the decision is obviously redolent of Bush v. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 9:05 pm by Dan Flynn
 A federal district court judge in Texas has set the starting trial date for the United States v. [read post]
14 May 2020, 1:13 am by CMS
Please refresh the UKSC Blog homepage throughout the day in order to get the latest posts. 1426: As we bring this Live Blog to a close, we all eagerly await the UK Supreme Court’s judgment in this important matter. [read post]
13 May 2020, 2:30 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Lord Kerr, delivering judgment, held that even if a presumption exists that Parliament intends Carltona to apply, it was displaced by a proper interpretation of articles 4(1) and 4 (2) of the 1972 Order read together. [read post]
13 May 2020, 1:02 am by CMS
He also notes the matter of the amount of data required for all class members is not a matter for this stage of the case. [read post]
14 Apr 2020, 11:23 pm by Orin S. Kerr
The Supreme Court recently relisted a petition for certiorari in Van Buren v. [read post]
29 Mar 2020, 4:49 pm by INFORRM
Mishcon De Reya Data Matters had a post “Data protection: UK Government sets out its position on “essential equivalence” between the UK and EU”. [read post]