Search for: "Matter of McCoy v McCoy" Results 61 - 80 of 193
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Mar 2019, 4:12 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Moreover, there was not a “mutual understanding of the need for further representation on the specific subject matter underlying the malpractice claim” (McCoy v Feinman, 99 NY2d 295, 306 [2002]). [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 4:18 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
However, “[t]he continuous representation doctrine serves to toll the statute of limitations and render timely an otherwise time-barred cause of action for legal malpractice, but only where there is a mutual understanding of the need for further representation on the specific subject matter underlying the malpractice claim'” (King Tower Realty Corp. v G & G Funding Corp., 163 AD3d 541, 543, quoting McCoy v Feinman, 99 NY2d at… [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 4:55 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
A plaintiff seeking to recover damages for legal malpractice must prove that the defendant attorney failed to exercise the ordinary reasonable skill and knowledge commonly possessed by a member of the legal profession, and that the breach of this duty proximately caused the plaintiff to sustain actual and ascertainable damages (see McCoy v Feinman, 99 NY2d 295, 301-302; Biberaj v Acocella, 120 AD3d 1285, 1286). [read post]
23 Nov 2018, 2:01 pm by John Floyd
Department of Justice spells out the duties of the Attorney General:   Represent the United States in legal matters. [read post]
4 Oct 2018, 4:39 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
  As a matter of social policy and definitely to limit legal malpractice cases, Courts impose a very strict privity requirement. [read post]
17 Aug 2018, 8:55 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
United States (Oklahoma Indian Welfare Act – Trust Funds) McCoy v. [read post]
15 May 2018, 3:53 am by SHG
The Supreme Court, in the 5-3 decision in McCoy v. [read post]
9 May 2018, 9:40 am by John Elwood
On the other hand, the issue is so undeniably important as a practical matter, and the courts are so splintered, that the Supreme Court should do something. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 4:40 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
More specifically, the continuous representation doctrine “applies only where there is ‘a mutual understanding of the need for further representation on the specific subject matter underlying the malpractice claim’ ” (Rodeo Family Enters., LLC v Matte, 99 AD3d at 784, quoting McCoy v Feinman, 99 NY2d 295, 306 [2002]). [read post]
16 Mar 2018, 4:06 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
What is important is when the malpractice was committed, not when the client discovered it” (McCoy v Feinman, 99 NY2d 295, 301, 755 NYS2d 693 [2002]). [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 4:15 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
In opposition, plaintiffs argue that the continuous representation doctrine applies to· Todtman Nachamie (McCoy v Feinman, 99 NY2d 295, 306 [2002]). [read post]
11 Feb 2018, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
The US Supreme Court heard argument last month in McCoy v. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 10:52 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Reed and Ryan McCoy Seyfarth Synopsis: The California Supreme Court heard oral arguments Tuesday morning in Dynamex Operations v. [read post]