Search for: "Matter of Morales"
Results 61 - 80
of 12,982
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Aug 2022, 8:00 am
Across two studies (total N = 885), our findings reveal - in stark contrast to the expectations of contemporary legal positivists (and some natural law theorists) - that most people do not consider law to be ultimately a matter of political circumstance alone. [read post]
3 Nov 2007, 4:12 pm
Shouldn't the cause for which you fight matter to whether you are entitled to use violence at all? [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 6:53 am
Why would this matter if I don’t believe that I will have the ability to experience that legacy? [read post]
22 Nov 2016, 9:01 pm
Her response is that the human species has the capacity for moral agency, and these various humans (including zygotes and embryos) belong to the human species and therefore are entitled to have their interests taken into account as a matter of right. [read post]
12 Jan 2023, 1:10 pm
The legal effects of various communities’ law practices are not necessarily legally coordinated and, indeed, cannot even legally conflict (although they can conflict as a practical matter). [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 4:34 am
Everyone here seems to be searching for Obama’s moral muse. [read post]
15 Aug 2023, 12:00 am
I argue that what matters, in terms of other actions, is not the moral status of the original action but rather other factors that may be confused with it, such as the moral status of its consequences – whether they are good or bad – and the moral status of the agent – whether she is praiseworthy or blameworthy. [read post]
10 Dec 2022, 6:00 am
On this interpretation, there are instrumental reasons to legally prohibit discriminatory acts to achieve a collective goal that the state ought to pursue as a matter of political morality. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 6:03 am
It’s a matter of nonviolence. [read post]
7 Apr 2021, 8:00 am
One, Helmuth James von Moltke, was an anti-Nazi, and a martyr of the resistance; the other, Bernhard Lösener, was a Nazi by conviction who nevertheless claimed to have secretly fought against the persecution of Jews from the improbable post of legal adviser on Jewish matters. [read post]
21 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm
” The ABA’s reason, which it included in a Comment to its Rule 8.4, was quite simple: “Moral turpitude,” the ABA advised, is a “concept can be construed to include offenses concerning some matters of personal morality, such as adultery and comparable offenses, that have no specific connection to fitness for the practice of law. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 2:28 pm
One can of course debate about particular matters, for instance abortion, capital punishment, and the like. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 6:07 am
If the party that controls the defense is not the party responsible for any related payments, there can be a moral hazard problem. [read post]
8 Dec 2022, 1:46 pm
The appropriate response to decisions like Dobbs is to criticize the moral judgments underlying them. [read post]
25 Dec 2018, 9:50 am
However, whether self-vindication and self-interest are taking priority, whether the law is being followed and whether well-established norms of governance and the constitution are being flouted are serious matters related to the government’s constitutional and moral authority. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 11:13 am
Supreme Court is likely to spark more controversy over the role of government in moral matters. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 1:01 am
If you have immigration issues and have been charged with an offense that qualifies as a crime of moral turpitude, it is especially important that you retain an experienced attorney to assist you with these matters. [read post]
9 Aug 2009, 2:31 am
Doesn't matter whether such laws would be a good idea or not, whether some speech is misbehavior or some exercise of religion morally or socially offensive to others. [read post]
15 Jan 2007, 6:02 pm
Since morality is considered a valid criminal purpose (see Margarine reference from episode 15 of the last term's podcasts), and criminal law is a federal power, how have the courts interpreted provincial attempts to regulate moral issues under other provincial powers like property and civil rights or matters of a merely local/private nature? [read post]
