Search for: "Matter of Neiman"
Results 61 - 80
of 100
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Apr 2016, 8:03 am
Neiman Marcus, the 7th Circuit held that incurring fraudulent charges was enough harm to confer standing, even if those charges were subsequently covered by the credit card company because the cardholders spent time and effort trying to repair their credit and rectify matters, among other things. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 9:51 pm
Neiman Marcus Group, 794 F.3d 688 (7th Cir 2015). [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 12:39 pm
This stereotype lurks subtly in the pantsuit and Neiman Marcus fascination. [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 10:42 am
Neiman Marcus Group, LLC, 794 F.3d 688 (7th Cir. 2015). [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 8:00 am
Neiman Marcus Grp., 794 F.3d 688 (7th Cir. 2015); Krottner v. [read post]
29 Jan 2013, 11:26 am
., in stores such as Toys R Us, Neiman Marcus, Nordstrom, etc. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 11:11 am
Cher: Oh, Josh will have that no matter what he does. [read post]
12 Aug 2021, 2:06 pm
And they matter to practice. [read post]
2 Apr 2008, 1:53 pm
Why is it you never see the Cheaters camera crew waiting outside of Nordstrom’s or Neiman Marcus?? [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 10:00 pm
The rest he classified as important matters (65-70%) or commodity work (25-30%). [read post]
7 Nov 2021, 5:01 pm
Unicolors in recent years has brought hundreds of copyright infringement suits against such diverse parties as Amazon, Dillard’s, JCPenney, Neiman Marcus, Nordstrom, and Walmart. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 1:09 pm
If the indications from a one-hour hearing hold, the Court might allow such sentences to be imposed on youths, but not as a mandatory matter for younger teenagers. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 12:50 am
Or other people’s trademarks, for that matter? [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 8:34 am
Defendants now move to dismiss the AmendedComplaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction under Rule 12(b)(1). . . .In re SuperValu, supra.The opinion then explains that the Defendants argued that the Amended Complaintmust be dismissed under Rule 12(b)(1) for Plaintiffs' failure to allege facts establishing Article III standing, which is a prerequisite to subject matter jurisdiction. [read post]
21 May 2016, 5:42 am
Unlike Neiman Marcus, P.F. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 9:05 am
Would the court reach the same result in light of Neiman-Marcus? [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 7:21 am
Neiman, the New York State banking superintendent, asked, ? [read post]
18 Sep 2016, 8:43 pm
In addition, the trial court concluded that the plaintiffs did not have “statutory standing” under FCRA so that the court lacked subject-matter jurisdiction over the federal claim. [read post]
22 Nov 2022, 4:58 am
In Neiman-Marcus v. [read post]
22 Aug 2010, 8:31 am
Neiman Marcus Pricing for Legal Services [read post]
