Search for: "Matter of Petitions for Disclosure of Documents"
Results 61 - 80
of 838
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Dec 2008, 4:23 pm
Under the law of most jurisdictions, a public right of access attaches to any document deemed a “judicial document. [read post]
9 Nov 2023, 6:00 am
The Appellate Division opined that to provide the documents demanded by Plaintiff "would undermine the assurances of confidentiality provided to candidates for judicial office", citing Matter of Harbatkin v New York City Dept. of Records & Info. [read post]
9 Nov 2023, 6:00 am
The Appellate Division opined that to provide the documents demanded by Plaintiff "would undermine the assurances of confidentiality provided to candidates for judicial office", citing Matter of Harbatkin v New York City Dept. of Records & Info. [read post]
[Eugene Volokh] Judge Denies Mega-Law-Firm's Request to Litigate Arbitration Confirmation Under Seal
1 Jun 2021, 5:01 am
(S.D.N.Y. 2013) (denying motion to seal documents submitted in connection with a petition to confirm an arbitration award, because "[t]he assertion that disclosure violates a separate confidentiality order is insufficient"); Aioi Nissay Dowa Ins. [read post]
14 Sep 2007, 2:46 am
Sept. 5, 2007), the court is very explicit about why it reviewed the writ petition on the merits (citations omitted): "Although writ review of discovery rulings is generally disfavored, interlocutory review by writ is the only adequate remedy when, as here, a court compels the disclosure of documents or information that may be subject to a privilege, because ‘once privileged matter has been disclosed there is no… [read post]
13 Jan 2009, 9:32 am
While formulating a petition drive, make sure that the petition documents incorporate the text of the affected law or ordinance, including material or relevant text that is the subject of the petition drive. [read post]
11 Nov 2007, 6:54 am
An attorney who files a petition initiating a case on behalf of a debtor, or who appears for a debtor in a case other than as special counsel for a debtor for limited purposes, shall represent the debtor in all matters in the case, including contested matters and adversary proceedings, unless the Bankruptcy Court permits the attorney to withdraw in accordance with BLR 9010-5. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 2:03 pm
Accordingly, the court grants the cross-motion to dismiss the petition. [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 12:17 pm
In total, the petition was considered at eight conferences. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 5:00 am
Noting that Supreme Court determined that Petitioner failed to "reasonably describe the documents so that they [could] be located", the Appellate Division reverse the lower court's decision and remitted the matter to it "for further proceedings on the petition". [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 5:00 am
Noting that Supreme Court determined that Petitioner failed to "reasonably describe the documents so that they [could] be located", the Appellate Division reverse the lower court's decision and remitted the matter to it "for further proceedings on the petition". [read post]
26 Sep 2014, 3:55 pm
Supreme Court dismissed the petition for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. [read post]
19 Aug 2007, 9:57 pm
These are documents which were included in thepublic records demand that Mr. [read post]
Jeffrey P. Gale, P.A. // Protecting Privacy and Privilege Rights in Non-Party Requests for Documents
15 Jun 2023, 12:01 pm
After the filing of this petition, the trial court considered a motion for protective order from the accountant and entered an order providing a procedure for the accountant to gather the documents sought by the subpoena. [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 7:00 am
By order dated January 7, 2020, Supreme Court denied the petition as to demand Nos. 1 and 9, granted the petition as to demand Nos. 6-8 to the extent of directing respondent to disclose any responsive documents pertaining to multifamily homes, and scheduled an evidentiary hearing as to whether documents pertaining to demand Nos. 2-5 "were maintained in a format and file size that could reasonably be transferred to and produced on a flash drive. [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 7:00 am
By order dated January 7, 2020, Supreme Court denied the petition as to demand Nos. 1 and 9, granted the petition as to demand Nos. 6-8 to the extent of directing respondent to disclose any responsive documents pertaining to multifamily homes, and scheduled an evidentiary hearing as to whether documents pertaining to demand Nos. 2-5 "were maintained in a format and file size that could reasonably be transferred to and produced on a flash drive. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 10:19 am
On rehearing, a unanimous panel changes course in In re Grand Jury Matter #3, No. 15-2475 (Jan. 27, 2017), holding in this “out-of-lane” case that appellate jurisdiction survived the return of an indictment against a target-turned-defendant challenging a document's presentation to the grand jury. [read post]
21 Mar 2014, 8:15 pm
As a practical matter, in probably 90% of all dissolutions and legal separations, the PDOD is the only disclosure document that will ever be exchanged. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 2:04 pm
On the other hand, the respondents have cross-moved for a protective order with regard to the requested disclosure and for an order dismissing that branch of the petition seeking to declare the decedent's wills invalid. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 4:00 am
An agency "may deny access" to records that "are specifically exempted from disclosure by state or federal statute. [read post]
