Search for: "Matter of Richter"
Results 61 - 80
of 371
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Dec 2020, 10:07 pm
If answered in the affirmative, the matter fell within the scope of the PPV Act. [read post]
23 Dec 2020, 6:11 am
Kluwer Trademark Blog reported on the case of Bayer v Richter/Exeltis which seems to change this understanding. [read post]
17 Dec 2020, 4:04 am
Richter and Exeltis sued Bayer for damages. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 3:37 pm
Not to waste this space on a summary of main points of the CoA’s equivalence approach, let’s just refer to – detached from the facts of the case, and delving into the meat of the matter – paragraphs 4.1 – 4.11 of attached English translation of the CoA’s judgment (machine style, as a disclaimer to errors to be encountered; the original Dutch version can be found here). [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 3:19 am
In other words, it is a matter of enjoining the litigant from initiating or continuing parallel litigation in another jurisdiction. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 7:52 am
The next generation of users of the system will expect a remote, distributed and technology-based process as a matter of course and, as indicated by the EPO’s recent Progress Report, the technology supports adoption of ViCo now. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 3:33 am
More cuts are only a matter of time. [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 1:33 pm
More cuts are only a matter of time. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 4:07 pm
by Agnieszka Sztoldman “On 17 September the CJEU handed down a long-awaited judgment on a matter that thrilled sports fans and the IP community (C-449/18P, C-474/18P, available in French and Spanish). [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 1:03 am
At the same time, however, the Court does not draw the consequences of its interpretation, tending in particular to ignore to some extent Article 12 of the ETSI policy, which provides that its interpretation is a matter for French law. [read post]
2 Dec 2020, 11:08 am
Some quotes of their reaction (my translation, original text in German here): ‘As is not clear how long the pandemic will go on, it appears necessary that oral hearings before the Boards of Appeal are held as VICO even without the consent of the parties, in order to avoid a standstill in the administration of justice, especially in cases that have already been in process for a long time, but also in cases in which one party has an interest in delaying the matter. [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 8:15 am
Likewise, the local court is not obliged to deem the EPO proceedings as a prejudicial matter and this is entirely at the discretion of the judge. [read post]
27 Nov 2020, 11:20 am
In the meantime, please enjoy these remarkable oral proceedings before the Committee of Labour and Social Matters of the German Bundestag (in German only, but I’m sure you will catch the drift). [read post]
26 Nov 2020, 11:27 pm
” Isn’t it strange the Court judged it was the appropriate Forum to deal with extraterritorial IP and was in a position to set corresponding FRAND rates, even if neither Huawei nor ZTE consented to having English Courts decide on the matter? [read post]
15 Nov 2020, 7:05 am
Under current law, the IPI carries out only a limited examination of national patent applications dealing only with the technical character of the claimed invention, sufficiency of disclosure, clarity, uniformity of the inventive concept, amended subject-matter and formal requirements (for the IPI’s examination guidelines in German click here). [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 2:28 am
This is why lies from political leaders matter so much: constant lying tends to blur the boundaries between true and false. [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 12:33 am
With regard to filing statements and objections to an expert report, a separate consideration is that the subject matter of the lawsuit requires special or technical preparatory work. [read post]
27 Oct 2020, 7:51 am
Does it matter? [read post]
26 Oct 2020, 2:49 am
In other words, it does not matter whether it is pemetrexed disodium or diacid, as long as it is an antifolate combined with vitamin B12. 4. [read post]
23 Oct 2020, 3:38 am
Some read the UPCA as having the exclusive competence on patent law, others say that the whole project is based on Art 118 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), and the fact that the EU has not signed the EPC does not matter, since the Unitary Patent is an EU intellectual property title. [read post]
