Search for: "Matter of State of New York v Robert G." Results 61 - 80 of 265
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Oct 2009, 8:50 am
The New York Court of Appeals heard oral arguments on Tuesday, October 13, in two cases that might provide a vehicle for the court to weigh in on the question whether same-sex couples who marry elsewhere are entitled to have their marriages recognized in New York. [read post]
25 Aug 2009, 7:05 am
      The Roberts Majority and Corporate Influence in Politics Enter Chief Justice John G. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 6:15 pm by Morgan Weiland
Kalven, Harry, The New York Times Case: A Note on “The Central Meaning of the First Amendment”, 1964 Sup. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 2:14 pm by Roshonda Scipio
Munro.Abingdon, Oxon, UK ; New York : Routledge, 2010.Constitutional LawK3161 .F73 2010Framing the state in times of transition : case studies in constitution making / Laurel E. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 9:36 am by INFORRM
Robert Sharp, also of English PEN, has dissected some of the detail here and here. [read post]
15 Oct 2007, 7:03 am
Frank (06-580), raising the same issue that divided the Court 4-4 on Oct. 10 in New York City Board of Education v. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
Pictures published on the Internet, infringing copyright In this case, the applicants were Robert Ashby Donald, Marcio Madeira Moraes and Olivier Claisse, respectively an American, a Brazilian and a French national living in New-York, Paris and Le Perreux-sur-Marne. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 3:15 am by Lyle Denniston
It may encourage further debate in the legal academy about the future of New York Times v. [read post]
16 May 2017, 3:45 am by Edith Roberts
District Court for the Southern District of New York in which the judge talks about “how the Supreme Court’s recent Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. [read post]
24 Nov 2009, 7:42 am by Steve Hall
That's the title of Adam Liptak's report in today's New York Times. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 3:46 pm by Glen C. Hansen
New York City, 438 U.S. 104 (1978), that petitioners’ property should be evaluated as a single parcel because, among other reasons, “the treatment of the property under state and local law indicates petitioners’ property should be treated as one when considering the effects of the restrictions. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 3:46 pm by Abbott & Kindermann
New York City, 438 U.S. 104 (1978), that petitioners’ property should be evaluated as a single parcel because, among other reasons, “the treatment of the property under state and local law indicates petitioners’ property should be treated as one when considering the effects of the restrictions. [read post]