Search for: "Matter of State of New York v Robert G."
Results 61 - 80
of 266
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Nov 2020, 5:46 am
Science, but God v. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 11:32 am
The GAO did not review “the legality of other actions taken by these officials” and referred “the matter to the Inspector General of DHS for review. [read post]
12 Aug 2020, 2:35 pm
José Antonio MORENO RODRÍGUEZ The new OAS Guide on International Contracts Peter Arnt NIELSEN A Global Framework for International Commercial Litigation Yuko NISHITANI Kulturelle Identität und Menschenrechte im Internationalen Privatrecht Luca G. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 5:21 pm
(The court also ruled in a related but distinct case concerning Trump’s efforts to block subpoenas for his financial records from New York state law enforcement; a summary of that decision, Trump v. [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 12:13 pm
The Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2020, 2:28 pm
Levine and Judges Robert M. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 1:19 pm
New York engineered a flawless effort to moot the case. [read post]
11 Jun 2020, 9:39 am
District Judge Emmet G. [read post]
1 May 2020, 12:32 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 7:00 am
” Or, as Justice Robert Jackson wrote many years later in Ray v. [read post]
13 Apr 2020, 3:46 am
” Additional coverage comes from Adam Liptak for The New York Times and Robert Barnes for The Washington Post (subscription required). [read post]
26 Mar 2020, 7:56 am
First, in United States v. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 3:50 am
Roberts Jr. [read post]
31 Dec 2019, 4:40 am
G. [read post]
23 Dec 2019, 1:19 pm
With a few more days to read the inspector general’s Crossfire Hurricane report and watch the C-SPAN video of his congressional testimony (and listen to the no-bull version on Lawfare), I have five additional observations beyond those set out in a series of tweets on the day the report was released, discussions on the Lawfare podcast the following day, and conversations with NPR, the New York Times, and the Wall Street Journal. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 3:46 pm
New York City, 438 U.S. 104 (1978), that petitioners’ property should be evaluated as a single parcel because, among other reasons, “the treatment of the property under state and local law indicates petitioners’ property should be treated as one when considering the effects of the restrictions. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 3:46 pm
New York City, 438 U.S. 104 (1978), that petitioners’ property should be evaluated as a single parcel because, among other reasons, “the treatment of the property under state and local law indicates petitioners’ property should be treated as one when considering the effects of the restrictions. [read post]
31 Jul 2019, 7:46 am
City of New York (1998), and Free Enterprise Fund v. [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 9:01 pm
Chief Justice Roberts, writing for a majority in Department of Commerce v. [read post]
16 May 2019, 4:12 am
Adam Liptak reports for The New York Times that although “[a]bortion rights are at risk at the Supreme Court, … the short-term threat may not come from extreme laws like the one passed by Alabama lawmakers” this week: “The court led by Chief Justice John G. [read post]
