Search for: "Matter of T S B"
Results 61 - 80
of 19,468
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 May 2022, 4:00 am
Robert T. [read post]
26 May 2022, 4:00 am
Robert T. [read post]
26 May 2022, 4:00 am
Robert T. [read post]
28 Dec 2009, 8:23 pm
As a practical matter, it’s probably wiser to amend during prosecution rather than trying to convince the Examiner that “or” doesn’t always mean “in the alternative. [read post]
27 Jan 2020, 7:56 am
In the last few years, tens of thousands of Americans suffering from non-Hodgkin's lymphomas after using the herbicide Roundup have decided to take their matter to court against the agrochemical giant Monsanto, presently owned by Bayer AG. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 5:32 pm
Once again, some believe there’s arguably a shift on the treatment of patent eligible subject matter at the USPTO. [read post]
2 Mar 2013, 8:20 am
Adam B. [read post]
30 Jun 2008, 1:23 pm
He does have a plan B, but still displays confidence in South Africa's ability to host the biggest tournament in the World. [read post]
5 Nov 2012, 5:01 pm
Hence the biological activity of these compounds is not an essential technical feature of the claimed subject-matter, and thus not part of the definition of the claimed subject- matter. [read post]
12 Feb 2023, 8:01 am
Whether you like it or not, and whether you appreciate the significance of the provisions, they matter. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 4:27 pm
How do I know the prosecution's motive doesn't matter? [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 8:35 am
Though my post quotes the required LLC language, a few lawyers who have B-corp status noted that the necessary B Corporation language doesn’t require lawyers to subordinate client interests and simply requires consideration of various matters before making a decision. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 6:47 am
Respondent’s further arguments regarding matters other than the legal sufficiency of the claims were superfluous.Respondent’s arguments were in the nature of defenses, but the standard for considering a Rule 12(B)(6) motion whether the complaint states a plausible claim for relief. [read post]
24 May 2024, 5:35 pm
See Matter of C-G-T-, 28 I&N Dec. 740, 745 (BIA 2023) (explaining that “when considering future harm, adjudicators should not expect a respondent to hide” the respondent’s sexual orientation). [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 7:16 am
This question really has no correct answer, or at least none that is meaningful, as it's a matter of optics and semantics. [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 8:24 am
Reference in this regard was made to decision T 613/10 (see the decision under appeal, reasons 3.1).2.3 The opposition division concluded that the requirements of Rule 76(2)(c) EPC were not met (see reasons 4).The board's position3. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 12:20 am
Therefore, the subject-matter of claim 1 was novel over D1.D5 was completely silent about the S content. [read post]
9 Dec 2019, 1:10 pm
So, no matter the time of year, don’t let your company forget about its family! [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 8:28 am
Jakhu (McGill University, Canada); T. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 6:01 pm
Board 3.3.08 had to deal with an A 53(b) objection:[2] The [opponent] has raised an objection under A 53(b) in its letter 24 September 2013 sent in reply to the Board’s communication pursuant Rule 15(1) RPBA. [read post]
