Search for: "May v. Board of Directors" Results 61 - 80 of 4,822
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jun 2022, 6:29 am
” On May 13, 2022, Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Maureen Duffy-Lewis issued a ruling in Crest v. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 4:28 pm by Carl Neff
 However, a Delaware corporation’s board of directors may not change the terms of contractually mandatory advancement after advancement has been sought by the director or officer. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 8:38 pm by Scott McKeown
Today’s Director decision (here), explains that the Board may not omit analysis of Fintiv steps 1-5. [read post]
17 Aug 2022, 10:46 am by Eileen McDermott
Patent and Trademark Office (UPSTO) Director Kathi Vidal change the language of Rule 37 CFR 42.12(a)(6)) to indicate that the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) “shall” rather than “may” sanction abuse of the post grant process. [read post]
17 Aug 2022, 10:46 am by Eileen McDermott
Patent and Trademark Office (UPSTO) Director Kathi Vidal change the language of Rule 37 CFR 42.12(a)(6)) to indicate that the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) “shall” rather than “may” sanction abuse of the post grant process. [read post]
19 May 2022, 9:01 pm by Virginia Milstead
On May 13, 2022, a judge of the Los Angeles County Superior Court ruled in Crest v. [read post]
16 Oct 2024, 8:18 am by Izak Lessing
In an October 2024 High Court judgment, the provision of the Companies Act regulating decisions taken by the board, other than at a board meeting, was interpreted to align with the prohibition on directors with conflicting personal financial interests from participating in board meetings. [read post]
*New Case Law The Open Meeting Act (“OMA”) contains various provisions regulating how the Board of Directors of a homeowners association (“HOA”) may meet and conduct business. [read post]
25 Sep 2022, 12:37 pm by Stuart Kaplow
On May 13, 2022, Judge Maureen Duffy-Lewis in a case entitled Crest v. [read post]
22 Dec 2013, 11:44 pm by Kevin LaCroix
A copy of the Court’s opinion in the case of Green v. [read post]