Search for: "May v. Exxon Corporation"
Results 61 - 80
of 185
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jul 2011, 2:25 pm
by Kenneth Anderson It's likely old news to most OJ readers, but we should still note in passing that the DC Circuit, in a divided panel, handed down an important ATS case, John Doe VIII v Exxon Mobil Corp. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 2:10 pm
Drennen v. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 3:00 am
LLC),[5] and the other in the District of Columbia Circuit (see Judge Rogers in Doe v Exxon).[6] Both of these opinions support corporate liability under the ATS and likewise reflect the reasoning of Murray, Kinley and Pitts that the rumours of the death of corporate liability under the ATS are greatly exaggerated. [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 3:19 pm
Summary of Decision issued November 12, 2009 Summaries are prepared by Law Librarians and are not official statements of the Wyoming Supreme Court Case Name: Exxon Mobil Corp. v. [read post]
13 Jun 2007, 1:44 am
Exxon Mobil Corp. [read post]
18 Jul 2007, 9:02 am
HOWEVER, an even more interesting story is that of Exxon v. [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 12:00 pm
In Milieudefensie et al. v. [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 11:21 am
Peter V. [read post]
8 Feb 2007, 5:06 am
[Miami Herald; see also Parker v. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 1:35 pm
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued an unpublished opinion in Precon Development Corporation v. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 5:54 am
Last Thursday, the Maryland Court of Special Appeals decided Murray v. [read post]
9 Nov 2018, 6:53 am
According to the 2008 case Exxon v. [read post]
15 Aug 2022, 7:33 am
In Massachusetts v. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 10:39 am
EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION, Dist. [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 2:33 pm
Co., No. 2016-C-1647, p. 31 (La. 10/18/17), ___ So. 3d ___. [5] Exxon Shipping Co. v. [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 2:33 pm
Co., No. 2016-C-1647, p. 31 (La. 10/18/17), ___ So. 3d ___. [5] Exxon Shipping Co. v. [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 2:33 pm
Co., No. 2016-C-1647, p. 31 (La. 10/18/17), ___ So. 3d ___. [5] Exxon Shipping Co. v. [read post]
20 Nov 2009, 4:09 pm
Nov. 20, 2009)(per curiam)(class action suits)(trial court’s class certification order in suit brought by gas station dealers over pricing and rebates is vacated and the case is remanded to that court for further proceedings)EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION v. [read post]
2 Jul 2007, 9:16 am
United Haulers doesn't seem to shed much light on where the corporate-farming cases may have gone wrong. [read post]
21 Nov 2010, 1:34 pm
The case of Exxon Corporation v Exxon Insurance Consultants Ltd (1981) 3 All ER 241 is a leading English precedent where copyright was refused for the word Exxon as an original literary work.Exxon argued it enjoyed copyright in the word Exxon having invested time and energy in employing linguists to invent the word, contending that the actual size of the literary work doesn't preclude a work from acquiring copyright protection. [read post]
