Search for: "McCLELLAN v. McCLELLAN" Results 61 - 80 of 130
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Oct 2013, 9:53 am by John Elwood
McClellan, 12-1480 (asking whether dismissal “for lack of merit in the grounds presented” is adjudication on the merits), and Unger v. [read post]
10 Feb 2015, 9:15 pm by Walter Olson
Green Jacobson, ruling in PDF; Bill McClellan, St. [read post]
20 Sep 2007, 11:57 am
" Janetta McClellan v. 4 Rent Inc. d/b/a Thrifty Car Rental (NFP) - "Janetta McClellan ("McClellan") appeals the trial court's denial of her Motion to Set Aside Default Judgment. [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 1:05 pm by Damin J. Toell, Esq.
McClellan, 127 A.D.2d 767, 769 (2d Dep’t, 1987). [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 6:32 am
McClellan, 127 A.D.2d 767, 512 N.Y.S.2d 161 (1987); Teeter v. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 6:31 am by John Elwood
McClellan, 12-1480 (whether dismissal “for lack of merit in the grounds presented” is adjudication on the merits), and Unger v. [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 11:59 am by John Elwood
McClellan, 12-1480 (asking whether dismissal “for lack of merit in the grounds presented” is adjudication on the merits), and Unger v. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 7:05 am by S
Corby BC v Scott & West Kent Housing Association v Haycraft [2012] EWCA Civ 276 are the first cases that have required the Court of Appeal to consider and apply the guidance given in Powell v Hounslow LBC [2011] UKSC 8 & Pinnock v Manchester CC [2010] UKSC 45 (our notes here & here). [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 7:05 am by S
Corby BC v Scott & West Kent Housing Association v Haycraft [2012] EWCA Civ 276 are the first cases that have required the Court of Appeal to consider and apply the guidance given in Powell v Hounslow LBC [2011] UKSC 8 & Pinnock v Manchester CC [2010] UKSC 45 (our notes here & here). [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 12:04 pm by John Elwood
McClellan, 12-1480 (after five relists), prompting a dissent from Justice Alito (joined by Justice Scalia), arguing that, contrary to the Sixth Circuit’s “serious misreading” of Harrington v. [read post]